@aral If you really mean it, develop in Firefox, and test periodically in Chrome and Safari. I had to do that, and had to do two different implementations of saving files coming in via WebRTC.
All usual caveats regarding Mozilla and z Apple stand. But beggars can’t be choosers. “At least it’s not as bad as it could be” is about the best we can hope for under extinction-stage capitalism.
@campx Most browsers I see use Chromium under the hood. Which WebKit-based major browers are you thinking of other than Safari (and, to a far lesser degree) GNOME Web?
@mike805@aral I don't understand how y'all are testing on WebKit? Do you have Apple devices you test on? I tried testing it with Epiphany but it's buggy and still different than Safari.
@aral while Safari shits me in some respects, I love how Apple have stuck to their guns while Microsoft caved and made Edge into an even worse Chrome. Firefox used to be my go-to but I struggle with some of their UX/UI choices, but still have it installed for testing (and often go for days with it as my only open browser). DuckDuckGo and Brave are great for ad blocking but don't feel right for other reasons. Google played a long game and are now springing the trap
@aral@skymtf@campx Folks, that was 12 years ago. They are nothing alike. Do you remember when Apple announced WebKit, which was itself a fork from KHTML, the rendering engine of the Konqueror web browser ? I do. Wouldn’t want to browse any modern website using that Konqueror though.
@aral getting a little tired of the hysteria. If you develop websites for clients for the thing that holds … 70% of all web traffic you are destroying… JFC get a grip