Google setting the standards for the web is like a fox setting the standards for chicken coops.
https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/blob/main/explainer.md
#web #standards #w3c #peopleFarming #surveillanceCapitalism #google
Google setting the standards for the web is like a fox setting the standards for chicken coops.
https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/blob/main/explainer.md
#web #standards #w3c #peopleFarming #surveillanceCapitalism #google
@losttourist It was always bullshit.
@aral "Don't Be Evil" seems such a very, very long time ago now
@chrisg Yeah, they probably want it to look more grassroots or some other optics bs. Four Googlers on the authors; entirely aligned with Google’s business model, something tells me this isn’t a personal project :)
PS. My favourite issue so far: https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/issues/103
@aral It's a small thing, but it caught my attention that this is under the repo of an individual contributor, not an "official" google account.
Shameful? I think so.
@nlovsund As always there are.
@aral With some chickens cheering on the fox.
@Flux Oh they’ve always known the plot. It just wasn’t the story they were telling everyone else.
@aral google has entirely lost the plot.
Google: Here's a proposal to DRM the entire web.
Everyone: We don't want you to DRM the entire web.
Google: The proposal is not final so you cannot judge it as an attempt to DRM the entire web.
The issue tracker was filled with issues mocking this proposal or arguing against it, this morning a helluva lot of them were closed by the person in charge (it seems), who proceeded to post this: https://blog.yoav.ws/posts/web_platform_change_you_do_not_like/
Essentially dismissing off hand any ethical concerns and that any proposal should be technical, when the fact is that the very core of the idea is rotten. It reads very much as "don't criticize us, just help us build this electric fence around the web"
@aral Closed as completed? Looks like a won't fix to me.
@jherazob @chrisg “Don’t assume a hidden agenda”, he says.
Dude, no one’s assuming a hidden agenda. It’s an explicit agenda. We know what Google’s business model is. We know how Google makes money.
Liked very much this response in one of the criticism issues:
https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/issues/66#issuecomment-1644936717
@chrisg Yeah, it’s scary what a six-figure salary and stock options can do to a person’s head.
I am certain their worldview is that any non technical comment is noise, so it doesn't surprise me that 1) they say this and 2) they genuinely believe it.
I like how he pretends to ignore that “Fuck you and your unethical ides” *is* the signal, not the noise.
@aral @jherazob @chrisg As I mentioned previously (https://chaos.social/@fnwbr/110747859317899180), one of the authors of the proposal, Philipp Pfeiffenberger, otherwise works on something called “Google Privacy Sandbox”, which is literally saying that they’re using the whole “privacy” framing just as ways and means for economic and capitalistic motives.
@aral @jherazob @chrisg To put it bluntly, the way I read that: “Privacy? Yeah, that’s just the cover up we’re using because other browser vendors are not playing by our rules. We need more ads. More ads = more money. For us, for everyone. MOAR ADS!!!” (Emphasis by Google)
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.