Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://chaos.social/users/fnwbr/statuses/110752251685792905">Florian Weber (fnwbr@chaos.social)'s status on Friday, 21-Jul-2023 22:24:23 JST</a><a href="https://chaos.social/@fnwbr" title="fnwbr@chaos.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/151928-48-20230721132423.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Florian Weber" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Florian Weber</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.ar.al/@aral/110752100433792012" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/95759" title="chrisg@fosstodon.org">Chris Gioran 💔</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/139848" title="jherazob@mastodon.ie">Jaime Herazo</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.ar.al/@aral">@aral</a> <a href="https://mastodon.ie/@jherazob">@jherazob</a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/@chrisg">@chrisg</a> As I mentioned previously (<a href="https://chaos.social/@fnwbr/110747859317899180" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://chaos.social/@fnwbr/110747859317899180</a>), one of the authors of the proposal, Philipp Pfeiffenberger, otherwise works on something called “Google Privacy Sandbox”, which is literally saying that they’re using the whole “privacy” framing just as ways and means for economic and capitalistic motives.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1826074#notice-3583222">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-07-21T22:24:23+09:00" title="Friday, 21-Jul-2023 22:24:23 JST">Friday, 21-Jul-2023 22:24:23 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://chaos.social/@fnwbr/110752251685792905" rel="external" title="Sent from chaos.social via ActivityPub">chaos.social</a></span></span><a href="https://chaos.social/@fnwbr/110752251685792905">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/1291685">The Privacy Sandbox“Why is Google proposing this?”
“New web and app technologies are needed to improve people's privacy online. In recent years, some browsers and platforms have taken steps to restrict or remove existing mechanisms, such as third-party cookies, without effective alternatives in place. This can negatively impact critical ecosystem functionality and put user privacy at greater risk, by leading to adoption of covert tracking.”
Highlighted: “We believe that developers and businesses should be able to make
money from their sites and apps, as
well as reach customers with relevant
ads.”@ privacysandbox.com</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/110/752/251/470/940/537/original/0b61f69ae693a796.jpeg" rel="external">https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/110/752/251/470/940/537/original/0b61f69ae693a796.jpeg</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: assets.chaos.social</div><h5><a href="https://chaos.social/@fnwbr/110747859317899180">Florian Weber (@fnwbr@chaos.social)</a></h5><div> from <span>Florian Weber</span></div></header><div>Attached: 1 image@interpeer Pretty drastic how someone is touting themselves as a builder of “privacy-preserving technologies", when they work for -the- late-stage capitalist surveillance technology company.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Florian Weber (fnwbr@chaos.social)'s status on Friday, 21-Jul-2023 22:24:23 JSTFlorian Weber
in reply to
@aral @jherazob @chrisg As I mentioned previously (https://chaos.social/@fnwbr/110747859317899180), one of the authors of the proposal, Philipp Pfeiffenberger, otherwise works on something called “Google Privacy Sandbox”, which is literally saying that they’re using the whole “privacy” framing just as ways and means for economic and capitalistic motives.
In conversationFriday, 21-Jul-2023 22:24:23 JST from chaos.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. The Privacy Sandbox “Why is Google proposing this?” “New web and app technologies are needed to improve people's privacy online. In recent years, some browsers and platforms have taken steps to restrict or remove existing mechanisms, such as third-party cookies, without effective alternatives in place. This can negatively impact critical ecosystem functionality and put user privacy at greater risk, by leading to adoption of covert tracking.” Highlighted: “We believe that developers and businesses should be able to make money from their sites and apps, as well as reach customers with relevant ads.” @ privacysandbox.com
  https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/110/752/251/470/940/537/original/0b61f69ae693a796.jpeg
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: assets.chaos.social
  Florian Weber (@fnwbr@chaos.social)
  from Florian Weber
  Attached: 1 image @interpeer Pretty drastic how someone is touting themselves as a builder of “privacy-preserving technologies", when they work for -the- late-stage capitalist surveillance technology company.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice