Notices by casey is remote (realcaseyrollins@social.freetalklive.com), page 3

@feld @lnxw37b2 Again, where specifically was the bad press about #ye using #ChaseBank for his finances?

@feld @lnxw37b2

> it was bad press

Where was all this "bad press" about #ye being on #ChaseBank?

> It's really no different than closing accounts because the person does porn. They don't want their bank associated with it, so account denied or closed.

I'm not defending that either, to be clear.

@feld @lnxw37b2 That's quite the stretch since no one had threatened to stop doing business with #ChaseBank because #ye had an account there.

@freemo I think that as a man, there's more you generally need to do to keep yourself from being homeless. You have to hold a job, pay bills, etc.

If you're a woman, if you're single yes you'd still need to do these things, but there's also an expectation, even today, to enter a heteronormative relationship with a man, where he provides for the woman and she doesn't have to work if she doesn't want to. If she doesn't want to be married or live with someone, she could still sleep around with various men from night to night and always have a place to sleep.

All that said, with the current rates of virginity, relationships and marriages among my age range, I'd expect way more homeless women in society if we don't get our act together.

@lnxw37b2

> Chase actually cannot. There are laws they have to comply with. And those same laws will affect X/Twitter as it moves into financial services.

LOL

https://www.atmmarketplace.com/news/chase-closes-kanye-wests-accounts-sparking-controversy/

> Those are his goals for X/Twitter. That's the reason he re-used his old x.com domain (once used for a financial enterprise that eventually became part of PayPal).

I see where you're coming from here. Still, his goals for the app's capacity for financial enterprise wouldn't affect its capacity as a social media network, functionally.

@Jain Who's #TomScott?

@freemo @freepeoplesfreepress @kravietz Well to be fair if I ran #Israel and this point and the #UN had ordered a ceasefire, I'd ignore them too 😂

@freemo @freepeoplesfreepress @kravietz

> It is up to the individual countries to choose to act or not when the UN decrees a thing.

I disagree, although I have already explained why.

@freemo @freepeoplesfreepress @kravietz If international law was violated, it should be up to an international governing body to bring down the punishment.

@freemo @kravietz It's not about me not caring about that distinction, but your responses are at times too simplistic to make that distinction clear. Going back to #Hasanabi, I didn't even completely understand the distinction he was making until his uncle #CenkUygur had him on #TYT to explain himself afterwards.

@freemo @kravietz I'm not saying there's no valid difference, but that most people won't care. This is what got #Hasanabi banned from #Twitch, if you recall, as he said that the #USA deserved 9/11 because "we brought it on ourselves".

He was certainly too strong with his words, but he was right that America's interventions in the Middle East created the enemies that caused 9/11. There's a difference between admitting that and justifying the terrorist attacks themselves, but most people just won't care.

@freemo @kravietz The line between "here's the justification" and "well what did you expect" is thin enough for few people to appreciate it, even if it is legitimate.

Regardless of whether or not I agree that #Israel did all of these things you're saying they did, the Palestinians (and more in the Middle East BTW, I have read #OsamaBinLaden's #LetterToAmerica and he agrees with your points in regards to #Palestine and #Israel) believe this to be so and their actions make sense in the context of their understanding of what has happened.

@kravietz @freemo It's so weird to see him continually use the same logic that many are using the justify atrocities against Palestinians to justify atrocities against Israelis

@freemo @kravietz When was the first Palestinian government established? I'm at early 1918 in my in-depth deep-dive of the history of the conflict, and haven't come across anything indicating a formal Palestinian state as of yet.

@freemo @kravietz > No not silly, wrong.. but you lie int he bed you make.

I think you should be more careful with the logic you're choosing here, this to some extent justifies out-of-proportion responses from #Israel to Palestianian instigations.

@freemo @kravietz Reform is absolutely better than replacement nonetheless.

"The state of #Israel sucks so it must fall and be replaced" is a silly way to approach the situation.

@freemo @kravietz I mean...this just sounds like a semantics game that does nothing but makes Jews angry TBH. It would be far more reasonable at this point to allow Palestinians to participate in the existing Israeli government than build something new from the ground up.

@freemo @kravietz Wait so are you primarily calling for Palestinians to have voting rights in #Israel?

@freemo @kravietz I am honestly somewhat astonished at this take.

> And yea, people might die, and that is sad.. but they also created the hate towards them directly via their actions

> When you are responsible for creating hatred, violence, and crime, partly due to the very poverty you intentionally inflict, then there are consequences.

People supporting genocide against Palestinians could very easily say the same thing.

@kravietz @freemo To be fair to him I think he said it's fine because we treat the Native Americans better than #Israel treats the Gazans.

I don't think that position makes much sense, but that's what I gleaned from his argument.