Notices by Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital), page 2
-
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 09:32:29 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. I think there's a case to be made about "optics" and "incrementalism", but you judge a tree by the fruit it produces. If your self-censorship isn't met with a proportional shift from the other party, you're just a useful idiot. This is transactional politics- if you are the one doing all the giving and the other party just isn't holding up their end- you're being used. -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 02:05:27 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. I mean, I know how *you* feel. I wqnt to get his answers though. It's unfortunate, because he is far more interested in getting into pissing matches with you or offering cryptic non-sequiters than elaborating on things. -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 01:36:32 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Maybe he means as some kind of controlled opposition party. But if that's what he thinks, he should say that and justify it instead of just asserting as some kind of "nuh uh" -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 01:27:22 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. From now on I REFUSE to believe the sun will rise tomorrow just because I saw it rise today and all of my prior life experience would lead me to believe it will continue to do that, because everything is just random chance and shit -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 00:58:24 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Yeah fuck it. Let's reduce any possible scenario to a fucking coinflip, sure. Let's just ignore causality and shit.
You're sounding like someone who thinks they're a lot smarter than they actually are. -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 00:54:30 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Right, so it's even weirder when you choose not to for certain things. -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 00:47:41 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Right... "I'll never outright state an explicit position and leave *everything* up to the viewers' interpretation, but *you're* the insincere one" -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 00:45:15 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Alright, tie it back to the thesis statement now.
Why should we believe trump's second term will be different to his first term (insofar as, he makes a bunch of promises, or talks big about stuff, makes some signals with rhetoric, and then doesn't do any of it)? -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 00:23:45 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Because alcoholism is a disease that you cannot overcome on your own as a flawed person. Accepting your powerlessness allows you to rely on your higher power and grow spiritually. -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 00:19:36 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. You know that the literal first step of AA is to admit and accept powerlessness? -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 00:05:51 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. ? -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 25-Nov-2024 23:58:58 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. >as far as an epstein tape, either there isn't one, or the fear that it would open up a massive problem for a ton of powerful people has kept them from using it. If the latter, then it actually is very weak blackmail.
Why do you assume that? -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 25-Nov-2024 23:47:42 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Yeah, good rhetoric, but again, politics is transactional. People didn't vote for trump/vance to do stuff they could do without title or office (rhetoric, posting). If they don't do anything, they're not holding up their end of the transaction. -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 25-Nov-2024 23:42:04 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Talk is cheap. It's great that these ideas and rhetoric are getting put out in front of a wider audience, but vance isn't some pseudonymous poster. He *could* actually do things, at least in theory. -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 25-Nov-2024 13:12:40 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Imagining some shitlib with a time machine trying to pull a "kill baby hitler" type thing but they're going back to try and make sure harry potter doesn't get popular to ensure jk rowling doesn't get a platform. Hijinks ensue as a 2024 shitlib tries desperately to explain to their nearest ideological analogues of the late 90s - early 2000s that actually being a crossdressing, self-mutilating pervert is in fact completely normal and must be defended at all costs -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 22-Nov-2024 07:33:36 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. ESG doesn't come without costs. But you can accept those costs at a much lower impact to your financial ratios. -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 22-Nov-2024 07:33:19 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. The smaller companies that *are* doing it and *doing it succesfully* are probably not very volatile though.
>several reasons to repurchase that aren't directly manipulation, and one good reason is if you feel your stock is under valued.
Doing a buyback to effect this is manipulation though. If you are likely at that point, your company is probably pretty stagnant. If you are a smaller company, it's probably better to put that money into diversifying for the ling term. -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 22-Nov-2024 07:31:35 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. I don't know how an action directly taken by a company to directly impact stock price *isn't* manipulation. If you think it's undervalued and you do a buyback to increase the value, that is by definition manipulation -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 22-Nov-2024 07:31:34 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. Investors also don't only look at the face value of a stock when determining what to buy. If you do the buyback just to increase face value and/or eps but it's still low volatility you're only going to attract investors who are looking to offset a large, or even appropriately-sized risk appetite -
Embed this notice
Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. (doctorsex@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 22-Nov-2024 07:16:27 JST Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq. If you are *taking a loan* to do buybacks that is a red flag. You *can* swing that but that is not a good idea. Unless you *want* that debt, but there are better ways to do that.