I rarely use ride-sharing apps because they're destructive to public infrastructure I care about, but recently I had to use Lyft and YOU CAN'T USE IT ON THE WEB. Their website literally tells you to go get the app, so you can't use a desktop browser at all to access their platform. That is an absolutely *wild* choice, and even more absurd that it goes unnoticed in the current media/tech ecosystem.
Is there a name for when people reply to a social media post but they're definitely talking to an imagined audience or a theoretical opponent, instead of to the person and post that they're actually responding to?
I’ve been thinking about doing a tech advice live stream where I take questions about the tech industry (especially careers, particularly people who are early career) and how it works. Would anybody be interested in watching that, or submitting questions for a test run?
@stefan@evan@wendinoakland fwiw I don’t think there’s a credible path of non-engagement as long as hundreds of millions of well-intentioned users are involved. We have to pursue harm reduction for them even as we push to hold meta accountable; if we follow the analogy of email or podcasts, there are absolutely vendors in both those spaces profiteering grom fascism. Yet we need those formats to be open.
Has anybody done a video edit of the iPhone X launch where they talked up the merits of getting rid of the home button vs. the recent iPhone launches where they talk up the merits of having new action and photo buttons?
Has anybody switched from a standalone 2FA app like Google Authenticator or Authy to Apple’s Passwords app? Looking for folks who have actual experience with it and how it works.