@lanodan @famfo @fossdd i can get that sentinment - it probably feels natural to me since that was how our networking prof got us to layer the networking (coming from a infra/administration background). Ignoring Layer 2 is just not possible when you operate with non-multi-layer switches (i.e. good ol switches)
Notices by muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Mar-2025 00:16:43 JST muxelplexer
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Mar-2025 00:16:42 JST muxelplexer
@lanodan @famfo @fossdd also on a side note: wasn’t it technically the DARPA networking model instead of TCP/IP or do i have brainworms?
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Mar-2025 00:04:47 JST muxelplexer
Except there’s no such thing as layer 1/2/…/5/6 on TCP/IP. Yeah - they aren’t numbered. There is still Link/Internet/Transport/Application Layers though. Call them what you want but imo that’s a bit pedantic lol.
Yes - but that only applies from the Transport layer upwards - as it does with OSI. In OSI we just ignore Session/Presentation since they are obsoleted. Once you go downwards you have abstracted a physical electrical connection together with a link-layer MAC connection - which is not beneficial when working on those lower layers.
PPPoE is encapsulation of Layer 2 frames in Layer 3 packets in OSI terms, which is nothing too mind bending.
((sorry if i come off as a bit annoyed but OSI layer model is more than just a reference for programmers and i may have PTSD on the layer systems from Networking classes :p ))
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Mar-2025 00:04:46 JST muxelplexer
@lanodan @famfo @fossdd generally you can just use either and make the best of both worlds by acknowledging the OSI split between physical/link and the TCP/IP amalgation of application layer - but in terms of naming the layers imo OSI is superior
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Mar-2025 23:39:14 JST muxelplexer
@lanodan @famfo @fossdd but isnt the issue with TCP/IP the combination of OSI layer 1 & 2? Not like anyone will care about OSI layer 5/6 these days either but we've been told thats why both are still around battling around -
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Oct-2024 04:29:43 JST muxelplexer
@kaia Pizza Owners be like: “HUSH - CAN’T YOU SEE I’M TRYING TO SELL COCAINE?!” :p
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 22:00:12 JST muxelplexer
@lanodan the plan’s inside of my walls - just like MINIX’s inside of my silicon
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 21:54:59 JST muxelplexer
love how the CIA could neither confirm not deny their interest in Plan9.
what are they hiding from us???!!!! /s
https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/foia-cia-plan-9-from-bell-labs-82547/
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Thursday, 05-Sep-2024 19:51:21 JST muxelplexer
@puniko meteoswiss :neofox_hyper:
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Friday, 26-Jul-2024 16:10:46 JST muxelplexer
why is “expecting people to second guess what they are doing” such a high bar of expectation.
how do 9gb vscode ctag files get checked in into a git repo AND THEN MERGED INTO MAIN ;-;
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Friday, 10-May-2024 21:52:03 JST muxelplexer
@loke @ktemkin i have seen a README with C Preprocessor #ifdefs.
People will abuse the C preprocessor for anything
-
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Thursday, 10-Aug-2023 06:26:46 JST muxelplexer
@kaia @shibao @vivi to be fair that is what most of society punches into you as a teen boy. I remember multiple child/teen shows where characters picked on effeminate boys. -
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Sunday, 30-Jul-2023 20:32:03 JST muxelplexer
everytime i think "oh i could use boost for this" i am reminded that 6 minutes cmake configures are not fun. -
Embed this notice
muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Apr-2023 17:34:15 JST muxelplexer
@cnx @xarvos @Jain Will be looking into extending the blobcat population of this Kingdom later today! :ablobhype: