GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Notices by muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)

  1. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Mar-2025 00:16:43 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    • famfo
    • fossdd @ FOSDEM

    @lanodan @famfo @fossdd i can get that sentinment - it probably feels natural to me since that was how our networking prof got us to layer the networking (coming from a infra/administration background). Ignoring Layer 2 is just not possible when you operate with non-multi-layer switches (i.e. good ol switches)

    In conversation about 3 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  2. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Mar-2025 00:16:42 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    • muxelplexer
    • famfo
    • fossdd @ FOSDEM

    @lanodan @famfo @fossdd also on a side note: wasn’t it technically the DARPA networking model instead of TCP/IP or do i have brainworms?

    In conversation about 3 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  3. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Mar-2025 00:04:47 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    • famfo
    • fossdd @ FOSDEM

    @lanodan @famfo @fossdd

    Except there’s no such thing as layer 1/2/…/5/6 on TCP/IP. Yeah - they aren’t numbered. There is still Link/Internet/Transport/Application Layers though. Call them what you want but imo that’s a bit pedantic lol.

    Yes - but that only applies from the Transport layer upwards - as it does with OSI. In OSI we just ignore Session/Presentation since they are obsoleted. Once you go downwards you have abstracted a physical electrical connection together with a link-layer MAC connection - which is not beneficial when working on those lower layers.

    PPPoE is encapsulation of Layer 2 frames in Layer 3 packets in OSI terms, which is nothing too mind bending.

    ((sorry if i come off as a bit annoyed but OSI layer model is more than just a reference for programmers and i may have PTSD on the layer systems from Networking classes :p ))

    In conversation about 3 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  4. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Mar-2025 00:04:46 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    • muxelplexer
    • famfo
    • fossdd @ FOSDEM

    @lanodan @famfo @fossdd generally you can just use either and make the best of both worlds by acknowledging the OSI split between physical/link and the TCP/IP amalgation of application layer - but in terms of naming the layers imo OSI is superior

    In conversation about 3 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  5. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Tuesday, 25-Mar-2025 23:39:14 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
    • famfo
    • fossdd @ FOSDEM
    @lanodan @famfo @fossdd but isnt the issue with TCP/IP the combination of OSI layer 1 & 2? Not like anyone will care about OSI layer 5/6 these days either but we've been told thats why both are still around battling around
    In conversation about 3 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  6. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Oct-2024 04:29:43 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • kaia

    @kaia Pizza Owners be like: “HUSH - CAN’T YOU SEE I’M TRYING TO SELL COCAINE?!” :p

    In conversation about 8 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  7. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 22:00:12 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:

    @lanodan the plan’s inside of my walls - just like MINIX’s inside of my silicon

    In conversation about 9 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  8. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Monday, 09-Sep-2024 21:54:59 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer

    love how the CIA could neither confirm not deny their interest in Plan9.

    what are they hiding from us???!!!! /s

    https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/foia-cia-plan-9-from-bell-labs-82547/

    In conversation about 9 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  9. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Thursday, 05-Sep-2024 19:51:21 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • Puniko ?

    @puniko meteoswiss :neofox_hyper:

    In conversation about 9 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  10. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Friday, 26-Jul-2024 16:10:46 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer

    why is “expecting people to second guess what they are doing” such a high bar of expectation.

    how do 9gb vscode ctag files get checked in into a git repo AND THEN MERGED INTO MAIN ;-;

    In conversation about 11 months ago from larkspur.one permalink
  11. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Friday, 10-May-2024 21:52:03 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • Kate Temkin ????❤️
    • Elias Mårtenson

    @loke @ktemkin i have seen a README with C Preprocessor #ifdefs.

    People will abuse the C preprocessor for anything

    In conversation about a year ago from larkspur.one permalink
  12. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Thursday, 10-Aug-2023 06:26:46 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • kaia
    • 受不了包
    • vivi
    @kaia @shibao @vivi to be fair that is what most of society punches into you as a teen boy. I remember multiple child/teen shows where characters picked on effeminate boys.
    In conversation Thursday, 10-Aug-2023 06:26:46 JST from larkspur.one permalink
  13. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Sunday, 30-Jul-2023 20:32:03 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    everytime i think "oh i could use boost for this" i am reminded that 6 minutes cmake configures are not fun.
    In conversation Sunday, 30-Jul-2023 20:32:03 JST from larkspur.one permalink
  14. Embed this notice
    muxelplexer (muxelplexer@larkspur.one)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Apr-2023 17:34:15 JST muxelplexer muxelplexer
    in reply to
    • :blobcathug:
    • McSinyx
    @cnx @xarvos @Jain Will be looking into extending the blobcat population of this Kingdom later today! :ablobhype:
    In conversation Wednesday, 26-Apr-2023 17:34:15 JST from larkspur.one permalink

User actions

    muxelplexer

    muxelplexer

    20 // Computer Science // Marxismungodly admin of everything larkspur.one relatedIf you have any issues or questions feel free to contact me.Toots in Mountain German and EnglishBased in Austria/Vorarlberg or the ÖBB Weststrecke.No Gods, No Masters

    Tags
    • (None)

    Following 0

      Followers 0

        Groups 0

          Statistics

          User ID
          82714
          Member since
          30 Dec 2022
          Notices
          14
          Daily average
          0

          Feeds

          • Atom
          • Help
          • About
          • FAQ
          • TOS
          • Privacy
          • Source
          • Version
          • Contact

          GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

          Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.