@cendawanita I did not bring China, you completely misunderstood.
As I've said, if the situation was not between Pakistan and India, rather between China and India, the people accusing India online are they still going to accuse India then?
And how can this "Filipino foreign policy concerns" you're concerned about colour _my_ perception? What? Pro-USA and anti-PRC? Or, are you saying I'm pro-India?
1. When India tried to join the coalition against China's encroachment in South China Sea, I was strongly against it. It will only drag us with the India-China issue, and by having India in our region, it will only further escalate the issue with China (which the USA is already escalatiing).
2. I'm anti-communist-China (not the Chinese people, I'm Chinese myself, you can't be anti-self).
3. I'm anti-USA (again, the government, not the people), not because of Trump, but because of all the sins and lies the US government(s) committed against us since the colonial era.
So, what "Filipino foreign policy concerns" is colouring my perception?
Going back.
Will those people calling out India as the one in the wrong in the current Pakistan-India issue do the same if this exact situation was between China-India?
The problem with today's online activism is many are swayed by the loudest narrative without actually gathering all the information first. And as the current Pakistan-India started, information available came from news sources, and yet we see "online handles" actively promoting that India is the one at fault.
But again, are these "online handles" making a loud noise truly honest? Or, are they simply going with the flow? Because again, if this exact situation was between China and India, how would these very same online activists react? Pro-China? Pro-India? How can one trust these accounts if they can't even answer that. If they truly are objective, if they truly have information no one else knows, not even the press, then surely it is easy to answer that question.
Lastly, please, let's not start claiming that South Asia geopolitics is more this and that. No region in the world is more than another when it comes to geopolitics. If we're going to play that game, ASEAN is very diverse.
Confusing? CJK is complicated and confusing. China-Vietnam stems all the way back before the colonial era. The entire Pacific Asian region is deeply rooted in geopolitics since before the colonial era, and those deep issues are still affecting es to this day. Even World War 2 is very confusing for many because there were so many moving pieces. Japan was painted by the Allies as "evil" but once information started to come to light on how things actually unfolded, Japan was not "evil" at all, it was a fabrication of the Allies (most especially the US).
And let's not forget the sins the British Empire and other European nations committed against China. Who actually supplied opium to the Chinese, and how Hong Kong fell to British control.
There are also internal and cross-border issues. The Khmers. The Thais. Singaporeans. Indonesians. The Khmer-Thai issues. The Thai-Viet issues. There's also the Sabah issue between Malaysia and the Philippines (actually it includes Indonesia too but few are aware of that). The "comfort women", that to this day can make or break deals and agreements.
I can go on and on.
Should I say that the Pacific Asian region is more complex, complicated, confusing, diverse, than the South Asian region, or any other region? Of course, NO. Each region is unique. The geopolitical issues in each region developed differently from each other.
No region's geopolitics is "more" than any other. It only appears that way because a person is not aware of the complexity of a region's geopolitics and how far back in time it actually started.
I refuse to play that game.