@RandomCanuck I think it's possible to design a robot that would never say no -- that would never *want* to say no. I think there's a strong question of whether that counts as meaningful consent.
I also think it's possible to develop robots that would work other ways.
I think it's complex. Qualified no. Fine up until the device has consciousness. Not fine without consent. An entity that cannot withhold consent cannot give consent. Probably lots of other problems. I say, mostly not great.
@cwebber@bnewbold I do think if someone at a commercial startup asks the director to write a 24-page report including extensive technical research, they should help offset that work.
But Christine assured me that it's not the case; the level of effort was not requested and is entirely up to her. She's a grown woman, a professional, and knows how to allocate her own time.
@matrixsasuke can be. Especially if they're hurtful. If you said something cruel to someone that you regret, you don't owe it to posterity to leave it as is.
You are under no obligation to leave up bad takes or hurtful words on the Fediverse. Edit and delete are powerful tools; please use them to make this a better place for everyone. 🙏🏼
He/him. Board member at CoSocial.ca.Research Director, Social Web Foundation.Director of Open Technology at Open Earth Foundation (OEF).Author of "ActivityPub: Programming for the Social Web" from O'Reilly Media.Founder of Wikitravel, StatusNet, identi.ca, Fuzzy.ai.Creator of pump.io. Co-creator of GNU social.Co-chair of the Social Web Working Group at W3C. Co-author of ActivityStreams 2.0. Co-author of ActivityPub. Co-author of OStatus.Grad student in CS at Georgia Tech.