We mostly abandoned the idea of peer-to-peer protocols between weak clients back in the 90s, but end-to-end encryption is much more like P2P with some servers helping out in the middle.
This is a good comment. People think “the Internet” is big but mostly what they mean by “the Internet” is made up of a few million servers. There are *billions* of end-user devices. https://infosec.exchange/@JessTheUnstill/111325315059319626
This code is not cherry-picked. Every single line looks like this. It’s literally the most terrifying, unreadable pile of dogshit I’ve seen in my life. And as the owner of two dogs, I don’t use that term lightly.
Ok the option to turn it off is tucked away under Privacy -> Advanced but it warns you that you might experience painful side-effects if you turn it on.
Anytime someone sets a feature as a non-default, I assume 95% of users never touch it. When they put it under the “Privacy” settings menu, I raise my expectation to 99%.
But Privacy -> Settings -> Advanced, wow. That’s like putting it in a disused lavatory in the basement of the town hall, with a sign that says “Beware of Tiger.”
It’s amazing to me that a proposal to scan *literally ever private communication in Europe* is barely making newspapers, and we’re reading about legislative progress on blogs.
If there’s one thing that makes me deeply suspicious, it’s scrappy child-safety organizations suddenly having huge piles of money to spend on hyper-specific tech focused political pressure campaigns as opposed to, say, children.
If I was in the adtech or data brokerage industry, I’d sure love these ads. Encryption is bad! Apple is too private. Let’s pass some laws to “protect the children.”
Reading this WebP vulnerability report and I got to the words “lossless image compression” and “Huffman encoded Huffman tables” and I am trying to understand what we’re doing here other than paying for exploit developers’ kids’ orthodontia. https://blog.isosceles.com/the-webp-0day/