@aral I have similar sentiments about fascists and centrists. Fascists have relinquished their humanity and can be considered wild, dangerous animals. Centrists are the people taking us on unconsented safari.
*Looks at this headline* *Looks at cybertruck* *Looks at this headline again* *Looks back at cybertruck* *Looks at this headline a third time* *Looks at several videos of cybertrucks breaking down, falling apart, and refusing to do even the basic things expected of it* *Looks back at this headline*
Lots of people reading this are missing the point. Yes, `className` is a standard Web API property. NO, I do not expect it to appear in place of `class` in what appears to be HTML. Not an issue if you're not reinventing HTML for "reasons".
@aral Absolutely, I've seen that too. It's willful misappropriation of terminology. "Virtue signalling" is used almost exclusively by fascism-adjacent asshats. "Having virtues is bad" is such a ridiculous stance. But the term originally meant to appeal to normative virtues within a group. Technically, fascists being all faschy in front of other fascists is virtue signalling.
Sorry, just interested in etymology. Thank you for speaking out about that stuff.
@aral I mean... concern trolling is a real and rather troubling thing, usually perpetrated by bigots. It's a far cry from speaking up about human rights! So it seems like these folks are talking bollocks on multiple levels.
@gvlx@aral In what world could a (legitimate!) concern or criticism be phrased positively? They are negative by definition. You just want to silence critics.
*sigh* I have an American client who is having trouble, they say, being able to convert to £ (their end) for paying me. I have a business bank account for my LTD that only accepts £ or €, apparently.
Anyone know of a way around this? A service either they or I could use? I would *really* prefer not to change bank accounts but will accpt suggestions. Wish I'd known Starling was this limited at the outset.
Was just reminded that you can use *no* headings in a web page and automated tests will pass you for WCAG compliance.
You can't use the wrong heading structure if you use no headings at all! Automated tests can't tell where the structure needs to be broken up into sections because they would have to understand the nature of the content. #a11y
:has(h1):has(:is(h3,h4,h5,h6)):not(:has(h2)), :has(h2):has(:is(h4,h5,h6)):not(:has(h3)), :has(h3):has(:is(h5,h6)):not(:has(h4)), :has(h4):has(h6):not(:has(h5)) { outline: var(--error-outline); --error-skipped-heading-level: 'You have skipped a heading level. For example, a subsection within a section introduced by an h3 is currently introduced by an h5 or h6'; }