@screwtape as I was looking at the code (and in the context of the toot I'm replying to) I was thinking that I couldn't draw a line between collaborative programming and art even if I wanted to. Even deeper than that .. it struck me as "doing" ( as in "creating"?. It's kinda hard to explain) with "code as a tool" something that's actually alive !
Did you ever know that if you have a @SDF shell account you already have a #XMPP account with your user name as a handle and all you need to do is set up a password?
In #SDF#Jabber server are created from the shell with the 'maint' utility.
1. Log in to the password server by running the maint program. 2. Type o to select optional features and social networking 3. Type j to set your Jabber password. 4. Quit from maint utility and wait one minute.
@WarnerCrocker it took me a while to find it but here it is.
This whole thing was _so_ exasperatingly obvious and had such a deep impact on how we use the internet to learn, access information, communicate with each other that I still have a hard time swallowing the fact that we had to undergo this whole sh1t show for so long!
It has always been so self evident that it never needed a lawyer to understand it! It just took simple observation and common sense!!
So, and given that I paid 100% of retail price, the questions are: - How many "vulnerabilities" does it take to mark a CPU as a "flawed" piece of hardware? - Where do you draw the line? - Why there?
Copyright was never about "creators", it was meant as the legal framework upon which publishing houses were guaranteed a temporary monopoly granted to maximize the profits for their investment for as long as they can
Encourage the creation of new valuable work for the public good was just a side effect that would only take place once publishing house could no longer profit from that fictional legal monopoly they've been granted @tob@benno@gooba42
"According to the CJEU, in the absence of the data subject’s consent, the personalised advertising by which Facebook finances its activity, cannot justify the processing of the data at issue as a 'legitimate interest' pursued by Meta pursuant to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. "
CJEU-C-251/21 Meta Platforms and Others v Bundeskartellamt Just a snippet
"Furthermore, the CJEU held that where the user of an online social network visits websites or apps to which one or more of the categories set out in Article 9(1) GDPR relate, the user does not 'manifestly make public', within the meaning of Article 9(2)(e) GDPR, the data relating to those visits collected by the operator of that online social network via cookies or similar storage technologies."