>The Japanese version even mentions God when you visit the Church but this was changed to Gods (plural) in the international versions. How can this be? Japanese doesn't have singular and plural, I thought.
I thought might be the same reasoning @p makes DMs sent to/from FSE public. "They shouldn't expect anything different to happen", "Security based on goodwill is not security", etc. But in this case, as you pointed out, its not goodwill but the law. Come to think of it though, its probably illegal in p's case too. Aren't there laws about protecting user privacy in the US? (HIPAA?).
What if you want to get some crypto in a face-to-face trade? I.e. to spend or donate online. What if you've got some crypto in an online trade and you want to spend it IRL? I imagine it's a bit inconvenient to convert from/to cash all the time.
I was thinking more: why would they sign their words if they know they can be held against them in the future? Also, there's no reason HTML, JS, etc can't be signed.
If they're signed by the author, they're probably from the author. The problem is, what is the incentive for the author to sign the pages? >what if these pages get screenshotted? People shouldn't be so quick to believe screenshots.
True. But they're the best thing we have if the original article is deleted or altered. I still think it would be great if all webpages were signed. Then the signed version could be hosted anywhere for proof and there would be no need to trust centralised archive websites and search engine caches.