Love being beholden to a kernel that has such bad development and integration practices that just upgrading between versions can result in the inability to suspend and resume because of a WiFi and/or Bluetooth driver regression that nobody caught during development
Incidentally, this reminds me how *awfully inadequate* are the GitLab moderation and anti-spam measures; to this day, you still can't remove spam comments from snippets; you can't limit emoji reactions to *at least* remove the troll ones; and you can't block known bad actors, only report their accounts.
@brainblasted as I said: raging and complaining is fine. The line that should not be crossed is making shit up to appease your need for finding bad guys. Somebody’s opinion is also not at the same level of other people’s actions, and it should not be used to cast aspersions on a whole project.
@forteller this is really application territory, because only an application knows about its contents; so it's either a feature of the toolkit, or implemented straight into the app. It could be implemented, say, by the GTK text widgets, but then everybody else has to do the same, and everyone has to decide to use the same key shortcut. Introducing new shortcuts onto unsuspecting apps may end up colliding with existing shortcuts, as well.
@dalias that's, like, you're opinion. It's also fundamentally wrong on various levels, starting from "we as ordinary people" and ending with "vetted software without conflicts of interests".
You think you want an LTS experience without a support contract, but what you really want is the ability to upgrade your OS and your applications without breaking your system; for that, you need an atomic OS and containerised applications. The idea of running an enterprise distro without an enterprise IT department is deranged; why do you think support contracts and IT support personnel exist?
Controversial opinion time: free (as in gratis) long term support Linux distributions have damaged the whole ecosystem, and done a disservice to both users and upstream projects, all to placate the fetishes of of sysadmins and packagers, or the aspirations of people funding them as a product. We'd all be much better off if LTS distributions had only ever been gated behind a paid support scheme.
- SOURCE WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE OPEN - YEARS OF PROJECTS yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for having the source available - Wanted to have features for a laugh? We had a tool for that: it was called "PAYING" - "Yes please file BUGS. Report ANY ISSUE you found" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged
LOOK at what users have been demanding your Attention for all this time.
"Hello I would like you to support my use case please"
Ended up binging five episodes of The Apothecary Diaries in a row. It’s really anime House, M.D. set in I Can’t Believe It’s Not Imperial China™️ and with a gruff but cute anime girl
My last #introduction was in 2018, so let's update it:
- I'm a free and open source software developer, mainly contributing to the #GNOME ecosystem and software development platform - I am, through no fault of my own, the maintainer of the GNOME developer documentation website - I write the occasional app, like Amberol - I stream my work on Twitch: https://twitch.tv/ebassi - I still plan on finishing the History of GNOME podcast - I build #gundam plastic models - trans rights are human rights
Geek, husband, lover, software developer, Londoner. Not necessarily in that order.he/himProud #GTK and #GNOME dev; member of the GNOME Foundation.You may remember me for my work at OpenedHand, Intel, Endless, and the GNOME Foundation. Otherwise, you heard about me being a scary person on the Internet.Opinions are always my own, but if you don't like them that's too bad.