@AnarchoNinaWrites Yeah I read some centrist newspaper writer yesterday saying “fascism was 90 years ago, we live in a very different world” – as if the Trumpists weren’t being *completely open* about their fascistic intent. But like you say: they don’t generally wear uniforms (yet), so it can’t be fascism…
@esvrld Yup. And Trump spending $60m on “Kamala is for the they/thems” ads makes it a shoo-in that the centrists will also decide the Democrats need to definitively repudiate trans rights (sorry, “the more outlandish progressive causes”, to quote one newspaper columnist this morning)
Oh you know, just our “socialist” prime minister laughing and joking with a homophobic fascist while planning to emulate her policies, no biggie, everything’s fine
But as someone pointed out on here recently, Meloni has learnt the key lesson that, as long as you’re “well-behaved” in your foreign policy, you can be as fash as you like domestically and no other country will give a fuck
@AnarchoNinaWrites The constant hypervigilance as you sort people, conversation by conversation, into one bucket or another is exhausting in itself. Like, is this “nice but clueless” cis friend burbling about “women’s fears” and “irreversible changes” because they are in bucket 4 but being crass and (educatably) ignorant, or because they are secretly in bucket 2 (or worse) but keeping it civil? (A situation I often call, “last Thursday evening”)
@ryanc Whereas whenever British people go to houses in the US, we’re like, “Waste disposal units! Mixer taps! Air conditioning! Ridiculous! What’s *wrong* with misery, anyway?”
Honestly what with Tony Blair, Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting all sharing their _aperçus_ on the subject of trans rights – short version, trans people don’t exist, should be shunted into “side rooms” in hospitals – I’m swinging very firmly back towards voting Green. They have their own terf wing, sure, but they seem to have largely locked them away for the duration of the campaign – rather than free-associating the abolition of trans rights on LBC, say
I really had thought that Labour would at least not make things *worse* for trans people, even if they did nothing to make things *better*. But they seem intent on locking in even the horrendous stuff the Tories forced through in the dying days of government – and the logic of their position will force them to go further still
Whereas the Green Party are promising things like self-ID for trans and nonbinary people, X markers in passports, and allowing schools to continue teaching about LGBTQ+ identities, rights and experiences. Oh, and not setting the planet on fire for 0.2% extra GDP growth. Sure, words are cheap, and they're not going to get anywhere remotely near power any time soon, but still. When I look back at the 2024 election, who will I *want* to have voted for?
Yes, but just one minor detail: THEY'RE NOT CHILDREN. THIS IS A POLICY AIMED AT 18-YEAR-OLDS.
"Fining parents for the behaviour of their adult offspring" is a bold policy initiative that definitely can't backfire in any way *I* can think of. /sarc
I did google this and apparently they are, but are they *really*, or would I need to go up half a size to be on the safe side? (I’d already be looking at brands specialising in “the larger foot”, being a size 9 and having very wide feet)
J.M.W. Turner’s snappily titled “Snow Storm – Steam-Boat off a Harbour's Mouth Making Signals in Shallow Water, and going by the Lead. The Author was in this Storm on the Night the ‘Ariel’ left Harwich” (1842)
If anyone’s ever considered buying first editions as an investment, this first edition of bisexual classic The Buddha of Suburbia cost £12.99 when published in 1990 – and I just paid £8.99 for it 😳
Autistic. ADHD. Bi. Trans. Nonbinary. Ex-Christian. Married to E, offspring T, K & D.:heartnonbinary: :hearttransgender: :heart_bisexual: :autism:Profile pic: a small tabby cat sits with its back to the camera, bathed in pink/purple light from the TV it’s staring at, out of frame