Do you honestly think that the country would be the same under Harris as it will under Trump? And before you answer, I'm not talking about the Middle East. I'm well aware that America's negative influence in the Middle East would be relatively the same under Harris as under Trump. I'm talking about the lives of Americans and whether their lives would be the same under Harris as under Trump.
From a dialectical materialist view, saying that capitalism was a horrible idea is not true. #Capitalism was a revolutionary and progressive force in the 1700s, and it was successful at modernizing the world, connecting people of different countries, and improving the productive forces of society. The problem isn't that capitalism was always a horrible idea. The problem is that capitalism is now a force of conservativism and reactionism; it is no longer revolutionary.
What happened in Iran is probably going to happen to America (religious extremists taking control of the country and repressing every remnant of progressivism and social equality so much that people forget that the country was ever progressive), in part because a bunch of dumbass protest voters weren't willing to throw away their pride and just vote for Harris even though she isn't a good person.
No, it isn't. You don't know what you're talking about. Socialism, as I already mentioned, and which you could have looked up yourself instead of repeating your untrue claim, is the collective control and ownership of the means of production. There are different ideas of how socialism should be implemented. Some implementations are reformist, and some are revolutionary, but socialism is just an economic and social system.
This is completely unrealistic as an immediate solution to ending capitalism. Things like employment and money printing are embedded into the societies of every country on the planet. You're not going to be able to just get rid of them just like that. Any attempt to do so would likely take generations to achieve at best.
You're wrong. There are socialists who advocate for reformism, but socialism itself is not reformist. Socialism is the collective control and ownership of the means of production either directly or through state ownership. Socialism can also be revolutionary and advocate for a state-owned economy.
"Yes, Harris supports burning Palestinian civilians alive in hospital tents, and yes, she said she wouldn't stand up for trans people in red states, and yes, she supports police over Black Lives Matter, and yes she's been courting conservatives and abandoning progressive principles and it might cost her the election, but voting for her is the ethical, adult thing to do to stop America from becoming a fascist country."
Person 9 days in the future: No, we weren't living in fascism before, but now we are going in that direction because enough dumbasses didn't vote for Harris because she wasn't the perfect candidate who wasn't completely sinless, so instead we got the devil. Are you happy, all you protest voters? You didn't have to vote for a bad person because it made you feel uncomfortable, so now you have an even worse person. Congratulations! You should all get fucking medals! ๐
Why did Trump win? It's because millions of people who voted for Biden last election refused to vote for Harris just to prevent Trump from becoming president, and instead either voted for a third party or didn't vote at all.
Evolution prepares for revolution and creates the ground for it; revolution consummates the process of evolution and facilitates its further activity. #communism#socialism
Capitalism would have won if Harris won, too. There was no non-capitalist alternative that had a chance of winning the 2024 election. What won in this election was fascism specifically.