interesting argument Emacs will be good for LLMs because it provides a unified programmable interface for everything, it makes me want to try it a bit more
still seems bloated and overly complex compared to neovim though
@tiskaan I have tried doom emacs yes, and its what gave me the impression of emacs being bloated
> its more like an programmable textual interfce than a text editor.
yes, but the point is with neovim I can just have it working out of the box with no config, and learn to use it in an afternoon. obviously then I have my own configs and have added packages and stuff, but its optional. with emacs it feels like I need to add 50+ packages just to be usable
@teratology@7666@mja@xxtarlit neo-nazi satanist terrorist organization that encourages people to carry out ritualistic random killings and sexual violence
@allison@xxtarlit@7666@mja even so, I am still in awe at all the various people you have encountered, when I am one of the most normie people you know that's really saying something
@allison@Arcana@Reluctant_Weeb@vrtra yup, I def think that most self-described rightists have a lot of left-ish infection. historically, both nationalism and classical liberalism, which are basically the foundation for the whole right-of-center today, started out as leftist movements. there a few far-right people who are genuinely purely rightist with no modern distortions (e.g. Amerika) but they are the minority
@allison@Arcana@Reluctant_Weeb@vrtra its definitely true that radicalism in general attracts damaged people, but resentment is mostly a specifically leftist phenomenon. I would view the left-right axis as essentially what Nietzsche would call slave vs. master morality, and resentment is 100% a form of slave morality
@mischievoustomato@Arcana@allison@vrtra honestly, I dont think suffering is what motivates leftists primarily. loads of people around the world suffer far far more than the typical ancom in a first world country does, and 99% of those people aren't communists or whatever. I think its primarily resentment at heart
@allison@Arcana@vrtra unironically yes, leftist ideology is based on resentment at its core so it attracts people who are just generally hard to deal with and awful in a lot of other ways imo
@ai@mushroom_soup given she says "not religious" she's clearly just some ethnic nationalist, so probably is measuring by blood rather than the standard matrilineal descent rule
@adachi@chargrille@meso "the modern world, but socialist" is pure copium, either industrial civ collapses entirely or (my preferred outcome) we make the jump to a much higher tech level (nuclear fusion, molecular nanotechnology, space colonization etc.) so that we can actually maintain a technological civilization that isn't just a ticking timebomb
@adachi@chargrille@meso I dont particularly like billionaries, I’m just saying that wealth redistribution wont solve climate change
fwiw, I generally support liquidating all current money and property claims and letting people homestead whatever they currently happen to actually be using. all else being equal yes, I do oppose killing them, there’s no good benefit from it (relative to just voiding their claims on the world’s resources) and killing people is bad
"billionaires bad!" is a simpler and less radical soundbite than "our industrial society is foundationally flawed and the way we use technology has to radically change", so it gets more support
@meso@chargrille this would not reduce the amount of CO2 emissions and might actually increase it. the relevant point is the amount and kind of stuff being produced, not how it is distributed. if the wealth of billionaires was redistributed it would just increase the emissions of everyone else. and it might actually increase net emissions because normal people are likely to spend their money on things like houses and cars that are resource intensive rather than extremely expensive but low-emission luxury goods