we slowly reach the point where "AI advocates" need to be added to list of what constitutes being a "climate change denier".
AI leads to big data centers being build, which leads to massively higher power consumption, which means we get off carbon slower.
And the "counter argument" is that the benefits of AI will offset any damage done by climate change, which is simply 1. wishful thinking and 2. untrue.
(yes, it's all been a secret plan to infiltrate Nvidia and to get people to work on Nouveau instead from the inside as our previous plans apparently haven't worked!)
they said "Gamersโข (as in the self-titled ones to a point of nearly defining it as personality trait, not like players) are a special kind of toxic though."
but what does that even mean...
as I said, I do play games a significant amount of time and would call myself one.
But then assuming everybody else uses "gamers" as in "those toxic ones" doesn't get you anywhere, as you _will_ be misunderstood and only irritate the non toxic ones.
@lanodan Who is a "gamer" then and how many people are "gamers" according to this definition?
How many Linux users do we have?
How much higher are the chances to find a toxic person in all of the Linux users, and in all of the gamers?
The point I'm trying to make is, that there are a lot of people who would call themselves "gamer" without being toxic. And I don't think we can do that collateral at all.
I myself would me a "gamer" because I do play games a lot.
@lanodan my point is you can't just make such general statements.
There are certainly toxic gaming sub communities out there. But saying "gaming community" being toxic is the same as saying "sport community" are being toxic.
Sure, there are toxic sports fan out there, but I wouldn't dare to say that sports communities are all toxic.
Unless you say all of humanity is being toxic, but then the label "toxic" means nothing anymore.
I honestly don't understand the hostility some FOSS developers have towards gamers in general.
Sure, there are toxic gamers, but there are also toxic users of your random FOSS app.
If it wouldn't be for wine/proton, the Linux desktop would probably be dead already. I certainly wouldn't have become a linux developer if playing random windows games on Linux wouldn't have been possible.
And I'd wish that toxicity against gamers and gaming related companies to stop.
we should have `humanrights` as a default build option in every build system, so distributions who want to advocate for it have a global option to opt-in into projects expressing it more vocally via build time flags.
My personal opinion is, that it shouldn't be an option, but sadly we live in a world where some of it is controversial and we should force the controversy.
The most interesting part of Linus interaction with a bigot is, that those bigots "want to have the old Linus back", but they fail to see that it's "the old Linus":
Insulting people who should know better, just instead of kernel contributors and maintainers, it's bigots on the receiving end and they don't like it ๐
Maybe they'll figure it out if they think about it for a second...
Linux Graphics DeveloperFreedesktop Code of Conduct Enforcement team memberMostly working on Rusticl and NouveauNazis, $hitcoin cultists, Right-Libertarians, Longterminists, Tankies, techbros and other fascists not welcomed. This is a shithead free zone.Private account, please direct all business inquiries to: https://twitter.com/karolherbstlanguages: en, depfp is a head shot of a snowman with a red pot as its hatheader is a photo of a full moon and leafless trees in front at night