Notices by наб (nabijaczleweli@101010.pl)

@psykose @lanodan good to know its not just my patches i suppose

@psykose <- this user is playing the elder scrolls

Who up mountin they filesystem
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/pull/2
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/pull/4
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/pull/5
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/issues/6
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/pull/7

also I revolutionised debian patch naming https://salsa.debian.org/salvage-team/fuse-umfuse-fat/-/tree/53c723ffefc509fe88f142b2716c35fa56fd01dd/debian/patches (put PR titles in the filenames and replaced spaces with CJK spaces to do it)

@psykose oven: 😴
oven, loud: 😤

@lanodan i mean, by definition, unless you're using ar -S (and let's be real, you aren't), you can have RANLIB=true (effectively like SunOS) and you're not losing anything; so that sounds mighty complicated to do instead of /ranlib/d and /RANLIB/d

and if you /are/ somehow using ar -S, then just run ar -s after instead of ranlib

lads. the bitch with a vendetta is me. im writing the blog post. it's "30 years ago"

debbugs per blog post: 2 today (https://bugs.debian.org/1083034; https://bugs.debian.org/1083039)

behold post 015. where da lib runnin, which analyses the perennial "when was the last time a system needed a separate ranlib step?" question (alongside, unfortunately, more UNIX lineage than anyone should care for) https://nabijaczleweli.xyz/content/blogn_t/015-ranlib.html

when was the last time a system needed a separate ranlib step? this feels like something someone with a vendetta's evaluated

@psykose cannot start with the number 0 is insane work.

@coolboymew @lanodan opencamera is unapologetically on sourceforge, and it's live, and it uses many a sourceforge feature. so you never know!

@lanodan 20 million that every month accidentally follow a non-direct link to a 15-year-old tarball, clearly

> Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your project in front of SourceForge's nearly 20 million monthly users. It takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project releases today!

bro what

@mcc even the ars technica writers fell into the classic trap of anthropomorphising larry ellison :/

@xerz @cafkafk hey, we've had hurd-amd64 for almost a year now! and it almost entirely works! it's still uniprocessor tho

@xerz @cafkafk but also: yes. as a wee lass (i was 19) i wrote a GPT driver (it only had MBR) for the hurd and got hit with arguing with a foundation lawyer. honestly, thibault is the world's strongest soldier for managing to do anything constructive in this environment

"FreeBSD ports call OSSP software »LICENSE= MIT« (&c.), but OSSP software isn't MIT (&c.)", in which a significant proportion of OSSP software in the FreeBSD ports tree is misattributed: an epic for the ages https://lists.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/ossp/%3Cbyjcsfzkijbtq6gsttwtffbnmtxureozobxd3xyrbgig5qsio2@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz%3E

rip to ossp-sa :/ https://bugs.debian.org/1081186

in a continued trend of programmer illiteracy, gentoo says ossp-uuid is ISC (it's not)