Notices by наб (nabijaczleweli@101010.pl)

@lanodan if you wanna have a bad time you can try building your favourite program of sufficient size with clang trunk :) new horrors drop every like 6-10 months

@lanodan @mirabilos only found by clang with "sprintf always truncated (4-byte destination, 5-byte minimum size)" warning! and I think these analyses are relatively fresh (and you sure as fuck you don't get them on a full android build). one weeps for what bullshit's in there that /isn't/ caught by my heuristic-du-jour

btw there's some more in-and-around these, but both of them reduce to 1 line (cw gore):
https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_vendor_qcom_opensource_dataservices/+/431741
https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_vendor_qcom_opensource_dataservices/+/431742
https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_vendor_qcom_opensource_dataservices/+/431743
https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_vendor_qcom_opensource_dataservices/+/431746

just built lineage 22.2

ah well. https://review.lineageos.org/c/LineageOS/android_packages_apps_Gallery2/+/431707

did you know that you submit to google android gerrit by giving git a pre-generated cookie jar(?!) and guessing which one of 22 branches designated aml_ads_341826060/aml_ads_341826300/aml_art_341810020/aml_ase_341810000/&c. you can submit for https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/packages/modules/DnsResolver/+/3640810

ex... queeze me?

@atax1a ffmpreg 🥺

@lanodan @julia wouldn't that be a similar issue but for moslems?

one day they'll put competent dependency and escape tracking into gcc and that'll be the day the llvm foundation goes bust

tracking a bizarre what-seems-like-mis deduction and I default to Clang so rebuilding with GCC naturally gave me 4 spurious maybe-uninitialised and control-reaches-end-of-non-void warnings

also did you know that "the ABI of passing union with ‘long double’ has changed in GCC 4.4" (the function in question does not take a long double argument)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118676

@psykose @lanodan good to know its not just my patches i suppose

@psykose <- this user is playing the elder scrolls

Who up mountin they filesystem
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/pull/2
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/pull/4
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/pull/5
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/issues/6
https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/pull/7

also I revolutionised debian patch naming https://salsa.debian.org/salvage-team/fuse-umfuse-fat/-/tree/53c723ffefc509fe88f142b2716c35fa56fd01dd/debian/patches (put PR titles in the filenames and replaced spaces with CJK spaces to do it)

@psykose oven: 😴
oven, loud: 😤

@lanodan i mean, by definition, unless you're using ar -S (and let's be real, you aren't), you can have RANLIB=true (effectively like SunOS) and you're not losing anything; so that sounds mighty complicated to do instead of /ranlib/d and /RANLIB/d

and if you /are/ somehow using ar -S, then just run ar -s after instead of ranlib

lads. the bitch with a vendetta is me. im writing the blog post. it's "30 years ago"

debbugs per blog post: 2 today (https://bugs.debian.org/1083034; https://bugs.debian.org/1083039)