Notices by наб (nabijaczleweli@101010.pl), page 2

behold post 015. where da lib runnin, which analyses the perennial "when was the last time a system needed a separate ranlib step?" question (alongside, unfortunately, more UNIX lineage than anyone should care for) https://nabijaczleweli.xyz/content/blogn_t/015-ranlib.html

when was the last time a system needed a separate ranlib step? this feels like something someone with a vendetta's evaluated

@psykose cannot start with the number 0 is insane work.

@coolboymew @lanodan opencamera is unapologetically on sourceforge, and it's live, and it uses many a sourceforge feature. so you never know!

@lanodan 20 million that every month accidentally follow a non-direct link to a 15-year-old tarball, clearly

> Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your project in front of SourceForge's nearly 20 million monthly users. It takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project releases today!

bro what

@mcc even the ars technica writers fell into the classic trap of anthropomorphising larry ellison :/

@xerz @cafkafk hey, we've had hurd-amd64 for almost a year now! and it almost entirely works! it's still uniprocessor tho

@xerz @cafkafk but also: yes. as a wee lass (i was 19) i wrote a GPT driver (it only had MBR) for the hurd and got hit with arguing with a foundation lawyer. honestly, thibault is the world's strongest soldier for managing to do anything constructive in this environment

"FreeBSD ports call OSSP software »LICENSE= MIT« (&c.), but OSSP software isn't MIT (&c.)", in which a significant proportion of OSSP software in the FreeBSD ports tree is misattributed: an epic for the ages https://lists.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/ossp/%3Cbyjcsfzkijbtq6gsttwtffbnmtxureozobxd3xyrbgig5qsio2@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz%3E

rip to ossp-sa :/ https://bugs.debian.org/1081186

in a continued trend of programmer illiteracy, gentoo says ossp-uuid is ISC (it's not)

https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/38536

fedora also calls ossp-uuid MIT (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/uuid/blob/aa05b8cceb71977f6fc664f646456cf18f8b20fc/f/uuid.spec#_11). it's still not MIT

https://lists.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/ossp/%3C563boywip2ooev6xrta4xozn34ugzbj44a4md552femuzi3tch@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz%3E

Removed:
* The mandate of heaven for the C++ binding
(cb6aac7aafdac8844a064fa79b1a660661c498d4)

$ git diff --stat UUID_1_6_2..UUID_1_6_3
91 files changed, 3279 insertions(+), 10289 deletions(-)

ossp-uuid 1.6.3 :) https://lists.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/ossp/%3Cshcfm3rbzo6w7bcfngph7acwg2oroglnvdislcavyavkiuni63@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz%3E

should've posted this ITS before i started archiving OSSP, it'd be half-way done by now :/ https://bugs.debian.org/1081555

i think ossp-iselect is undistributable without at least repacking since it has "all rights reserved" files