Notices by braincake@noagendasocial.com

@Moon The risk/ reward calculus is very lopsided. Too much to lose, won't fight is pretty apt. The amount of power a relatively small amount of people have to inflict damage for wrong think is depressing.
Barring a huge social upheaval - I don't see this changing.

@feld Yer local docs and clinics are not gonna have the capital to store drugs on hand. Nor the people to handle the security and compliance nightmares. The (rapidly consolidating) health care "chains" sure. That seems reasonable.

I'd settle for outright banning drug advertising being a decent start.

@lunarised @Chiva @taoeffect @CattleBaron @bot That's pretty cavalier and/or eugenicist. If people never have trivial access to whatever thing causes their brain to trigger the spiral they can still be productive and useful people. It's trite, but that will literally tilt the odds of dooming some future genius to being a useless druggy.

@lunarised @Chiva @taoeffect @CattleBaron @bot A certain portion of the population is genetically disposed to addiction of various sorts. Are they just a sad casualty in this scenario?

@lunarised @Chiva @taoeffect @CattleBaron @bot Legalized drugs= regulated and taxed. Ergo higher prices, see the west coast of the US where people would rather buy cheap illegal weed.

@bot @Chiva @taoeffect @CattleBaron @lunarised I'd wager that a small percentage of people actually did seek out help when their issue had less of a legal stigma attached. BUT... I also suspect that number didn't move the needle in any meaningful way.