Notices by dew_the_dew (dew_the_dew@nicecrew.digital), page 3
-
Embed this notice
Are Modern Women a Global Catastrophic Risk?
Existential risks are those that permanently curtail the human and posthuman potential. Global catastrophic risks are those that cause utilitarian damage equivalent to killing 50 million people.
Although women have been the powerful sex for well over two million years (2 billion in fact) they only entered the economy with full force in the last 2/3rds of a century, and they only entered discourse as agents in the last 30, and they only entered power in academia in the last 20 or so. Women always had control over sex and mating, but that control was shared with family, friends, and norms of policing such as slut shaming, Jesus and so on, they only entered full unbridled control in the last 10.
Women had a speciation event in 1965, where a new subspecies of hormonally altered women was introduced. There has also been some drift in the hormones of everyone, not just women, due to phytoestrogens and other hormonal influences due to eating plants and plastics, among other things.
Women are weaker and locally restricted in action, so they only obtained full control over the upper society around 2007, when Urban population reached 50% worldwide, from 10% in 1800. This process of course was exacerbated by information and services economies where strength is irrelevant.
-
Embed this notice
basically our institutions didn't really have any immunity to female infiltration and social gaming tactics and they speedran it over the past century.
-
Embed this notice
"There are no women on the internet" was a famous 4chan meme explaining (mansplaining?) to women that if they are not offering the probabilistic sensation of mating access, such as anonymous accounts, they cannot claim the female advantage, their historic source of power. Therefore, computer science and crypto, domains behind the scenes where no offer is made, have made the largest strides in the last 30 years. It is plausible to consider that it isn't that atoms are regulated and bits are not regulated, as Thiel contends which makes progress in bits faster, but that atoms can be obstructed by the probability cloud of sexual access to a woman, whereas bits don't see gender or sex. Bits are the last equality of opportunity.
The forcible insertion of women into the economy and online life has, therefore, been very similar to throwing a constant and significant bucket of sand into the gears of a well-oiled clock mechanism, slowing down some parts, breaking others, and completely halting some parts, causing some of the gears to spin in the reverse direction from what they should be spinning.
In more recent generations, Millenials and Zs, men have observed all this and chosen to go NEET or leave the labour force, withdrawing into MGTOWhood and personal interests. This is strategically correct because 50% of men now are incels, unable to find a mate in the last 12 months, self-reported. Because women choose by rank within the accessible range of men, and now all women are faced with a million men and not just 200 friends of friends, most men have drowned under the waterline of mating access that is worth it.
Men are idealists as mentioned above. In the absence of women, men live in apartments like this and think there is no problem whatsoever. Without the evolutionary need to peacock resources, men have an order of magnitude more resources than they need. This causes economic contraction on the supply side.
While men are fearsome, women are fearful, so women voting incentivizes authoritarian and apocalyptic rule by fear, which can be observed in the drift in the media from somewhat neutral to completely scary in the last 40 years. Scary sells and scary gets votes, in a world where women have the power and the votes.
With men recoiling in horror from the mating market, women are now alone when not with their shared man, and therefore more frail, more afraid, more emotionally unhinged, more manipulable, and more security concerned, more tall trees get cut, more distributive policies get voted, more large government demagogues get elected.
Young women have the last standing positional ranking good (pregnancies and sexual access to them) in a mostly abundant industrialized society of the top 1 billion, therefore they get the bulk of attention in the attention economy. Women thrive on attention signals, creating economic incentives to make them get dopamine signals from attention relatively easy, namely, the like button.
Back to our favorite incel Shopenhauer: “Women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important.”
This moves society towards Debord's Society of the Spectacle. My ADHD philosopher colleague
@ContraPoints
Natalye, who has been on both sides of the gender world, puts it best, "you think you're in the forum, but you're really in the circus". Clown world is a consequence of putting appearances over realities, a fundamentally female imposition. Much of wokeness is based on this principle of appearance over reality combined with harmony and the preservation of feelings over truth.
-
Embed this notice
Schopenhauer said many wise things like "Men are by nature indifferent to one another but women are by nature enemies" and "the woman is animal with a long hair and short-sighted." This is true both spacially due to an evolutionary history restricted in both range and risks, but most importantly, like us the ADHD tribe, temporally. We lack the ability to see far in time because our frontal lobe is broken, women lack it because the immediate need for local provision of resources to themselves as their children, and their high probability of survival in case of tribal or personal conflict, both preclude the need to see far, and evolution won't waste braincycles in seeing what it doesn't need to.
Women are worse than men at about 98% of tasks, including raising children transmitting values, educating, and most historically feminine tasks. The reason why women have done these tasks through history is that they had relative comparative advantage unlike in diplomacy, statehood, science, philosophy, art, military strategy, crop planning, or any task requiring physical strength, endurance, or aiming precision, where men vastly exceed women's capabilities, and not just mildly exceed them.
Inserting women into the economy and later the web discourse and realms of power such as government, boards, academia etc... has caused a shift on the priority, hierarchy, and organization of these institutions to accommodate for personality differences between the sexes. Women are more attentive to how they feel, are more fragile, are more prone to emotional variation (not only due to cycle but generally), are far more concerned with harmony, and significantly less autistically curious with finding the truth for the sake of finding the truth, they are also less likely to be autistic, and ADHD, to have extreme personalities, and to have extreme intelligence.
The need for harmony and appeasement of feelings, combined with the low variance of female mammals, prescribes "cutting off the tallest tree" for that minimes the risk to the herd. Normal people are less likely to be fired if special people are prevented from thriving.
Female violence is verbal, consisting mostly of backstabbing, gossip, crying wolf, asking for help, manipulating through sexuality, dissimulation, gang ostracism, reputation poisoning, indirect harm, and if attractive offering the probabilistic chance of sexual access in exchange for power, and withdrawing it when the next step in the ladder requires it. This obviously is useless in farms and low density areas, but is beyond phenomenal in corporate boards and HR departments, and is truly godlike on the internet and social media.
-
Embed this notice
don't care, other people will
-
Embed this notice
the thing is that the strongest man and the best provider is the government/big corps.
-
Embed this notice
based demanding instacart enjoyer
-
Embed this notice
85 iq
-
Embed this notice
:face_with_raised_eyebrow_a:
-
Embed this notice
in retrospect.....did it actually work?
-
Embed this notice
it's odd though that their matrilineal criteria for being part of the tribe seems predicated on the men getting cucked
-
Embed this notice
does javascript even use pointers?
-
Embed this notice
like, i knew the jeets had a tendency to simp for the jews but wowwwwwwww
-
Embed this notice
there's a javascript function for that
-
Embed this notice
he uses it through the hole in the sheet
-
Embed this notice
papa was a rolling stone
-
Embed this notice
it's always greener on the other side
-
Embed this notice
no but my ass is grass
-
Embed this notice
>a fucking bird
-
Embed this notice
happy halloween
Statistics
- User ID
- 10714
- Member since
- 19 Sep 2022
- Notices
- 283
- Daily average
- 0
dew_the_dew
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the