(In morality, nothing is "clear" and everythig is complicated and messed up. To make things "clear" is to rabidly reduce complexity until all that is left is cheap sloganeering and aggressive othering.)
Had to order a new cpu which is annoying as the money was reserved for other things. When the new cpu is fitted, I'll be back. Until then, I won't write much on my spare laptop. See you.
Tried to lift the cooling fan off the cpu to replace the old thermal paste. As the cpu was too strongly glued to the fan bottom and the old thermal paste more or less had baked both to each other, I accidentially ripped the cpu off the mainboard socket and damaged a few of its tiny pins. I managed to straighten them again but they seem to have lost functionality nonetheless. So the machine doesn't start and gives out a cpu error in the debugging lights. Had to order a new cpu which is really annoying as the money was reserved for other things. Now I write on my spare laptop and that is no fun, so it may take a few days until I'm back blaring full volume about politics again. Enjoy the quietitude. :-)
Should people be mentally so unstable that they cannot take political posts without CWs, they perhaps should take a time-out from social media instead of asking everbody else to act as their nurse. And yes, cat pics get me to the point that I block their senders.
Leaving possible factors like corruption aside, the point is not about how to maintain hierarchy or that Fedorov's approach purportedly endangered that. It rather is about top-down- vs network-style leadership, which, in turn, is about procedure, not responsibility.
Even in a network-style decision-making and decision-transmission one can have hierarchy, that is: accountability and chain of command. It seems more "natural" when it comes paired with a top-down decision-making and decision-transmitting process. But one can have that in networks as well. And so I don't think the real dispute is about "hierarchy" but about top-down vs network procedures. For the latter, General Syrskyi may indeed be "too old" (or rather: too exhausted) to adapt to. As in times of AI-supported swarm attacks and gamified combat, a new generation, trained in online games, may find the network style easier to integrate in. But these are questions of procedure, not of hierarchy and accountability. (Although personal feelings may play into all.)
And I get "bombarded" with cat videos. Shall we have a CW for that too?
You don't argue in favor of CWs but in favor of people being entitled to be cuddled, and having that entitlement naturally without asking or overtly claiming. That is: You reframe in terms and as a problem of mental health something that is a topic of personal responsibility of what everyone on his own is willing to tolerate in one's own timeline.
As the standard user, foolish as he is, doesn't give shit about how his cat posts annoy me, I surely will not give shit about the annoyance he experiences when stumbling across my posts on politics. If people don't like them: block me, mute me, block keywords, etc. It's their choice. Don't make that responsibility for a healthy use of one's social feeds an issue of mine. Fricking kindergarten.
(Although Steidl is most famous for the publication of the works of Günter Grass, it's the German translation of the collected works of Halldór Laxness that endears that publisher to me.)
With U.N. spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric explicitly stating that "obstruction of humanitarian operations in Gaza by the de facto authorities" refers to Hamas, NOT Israel.
But in the sense that mafia organizations begin to pose as nation states, acquire their rights and means, for their own criminal ends. This amounts to nothing less than new forms of mafia organization as of national statehood.
Russia was only the first and most prominent example. Other states, other state actors, follow suit. But the important thing remains: Mafia organizations replace the nation state, become indistinguishable from them, assume their rights and means for their private gain.
Forget the conspiracy theories of the right (Pizza Gate, Hunter Biden's laptop, the Great Replacement...) and in particular of the left (U.S. fascism, the Tech Bros...) It's not about that. All the dissolution of the state, of oversight, of regulations, is not about establishing authoritarianism but about to facilitate self-enrichment, about creating not that much a system but a style of corruption in which the difference between "public policy" and "private venality" becomes impossible to be made.