@bonifartius @sicp @ins0mniak @nigvids @rebelai @Hoss

> same kind of weapons of mass destruction found in iraq

Oh, fuck's sake, do not tell me that there is a reason to build uranium centrifuges and not nuclear weapons.

> imo one doesn't need consensus on it,

The thing in context: "What's unethical? What's that mean? Think you'll get the same answer from two people? Stuxnet was designed to break the centrifuges and stop Iran from refining uranium: ethical? What if it targeted the NYSE instead?"

This is a :checkem::moon: problem. There's a hole in my wrist, typing hurts, I don't wanna explain myself. I have no interest in arguing whether or not it is ethical to frustrate Iran's nuclear program. The point was "ethical hacking" is a stupid term, meaningless. It is a line drawn by people that describe their jobs with terms like "tracking down bad guys". Don't look at my finger, I'm pointing at the moon.