Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this notice@coolboymew @Tsuki @BowsacNoodle @SuperSnekFriend @lykanthrocide @noyoushutthefuckupdad @sun
No, you retard. I questioned the necessity to use sexual objectification (of underage looking female characters, IIRC) to incentivize people to donate blood.
If people NEED to be shown some big titty anime girl (who otherwise looks like a little girl) to be motivated to donate blood, because NOTHING ELSE can motivate them, then society is fucked.
Besides, you don't know how many people may have AVOIDED the blood donation booth because they glanced at it and saw something perverse. If objectification can make people decide to donate blood, it can also make them avoid donating blood.
Either people are smart and ethical and donate blood regardless of some stupid placard (in which case you don't need it) or they're stupid and/or have questionable ethical principles in which case the stupid placard may change their decision in either direction.
You're trying to have your cake and eat it too:
> People are so stupid that they need to be shown a sexualised little girl to be motivated to donate blood, but they're also smart and would never let such a perverse graphic dissuade them from donating blood.
MAKES TOTAL SENSE
The last time I explained this to you, you were too stupid to grasp it. I doubt that anything changed, but maybe the other people reading this will understand.