@BowsacNoodle @feld @Angie_rasmussen @sun >Guess we have to discard all the things our eyes see and the mountains of evidence that suggests the WIV

There isn't. There's evidence they were working on unrelated viruses. And sure, a priori it was a likely source -- before investigation had started the WIV was an obvious place to start looking. But now *if* the WIV is involved in any way, there needs to be an explanation for data that currently shows a zoonotic origin *or we have to drop the WIV being involved hypothesis*

> had a hand in this because we can't 100% prove it okay pack it up people.

This is dishonest. The evidence says zoonotic origin.

> You're insufferable and retarded.

For following what the evidence says? Hardly.

>I'm fairly convinced you're either a fed or a troll.

I am not a troll, and am not currently employed by anyone, fed or otherwise.