@sim @kaia @sun if you mean true threats doctrine it has to be specific enough to show intent and in such a way that what a judge declares a reasonable person could feel threatened by it

"i wish it was legal to kill you" -> not a true threat, no specificity and it's not an indicator of imminent violence

"i'm going to drive over to your house at 4am and beat you with a nailbat until you die" -> true threat, has specificity and direct violent intent