@Vo @sun @frogzone git is repo management software, it has no concept of licenses.

git hosts should indeed refuse to host a project unless it is validly placed under a free license and license headers have been added to each nontrivial file.


unlicense is a bad license, as the name alone makes many people assume that there is no license and therefore the software is proprietary.

The license also doesn't cover many issues that face software - for example it does not contain a patent license.

If you wish to assist proprietary software companies just as much as you assist freedom, the best license to use is Apache-2.0.

But why do that?

You should rather defend freedom by licensing under the AGPLv3-or-later.