@bobbala @Scot_Paladin @STP @Twig @c00p @inscius @1137 @BowsacNoodle @Bunsen Okay, I don’t at all dispute the possibility that Scripture is going to come back and bite many people on the butt. My basic point is, and has always been, I don’t understand why Romans 11 proves Christians are just supposed to believe these so-called “jews“ are more important than the descendants of the First-Century Blood-Israelites who actually became Christians; and why we’re just supposed to let them flood our lands with niggers ?!
How many of them actually have Israelite blood ? And even if they did, why does that somehow outweigh the needs of Palestinian Christians - who demonstrably *do* have Israelite blood ?
It’s obvious to me the primary sense of Romans 11 was intended to explain the situation regarding as-yet unconverted Israelites to the newly-Baptized, who some twenty-years later lost any “plausible deniability” once the Temple was destroyed. It‘s just more reasonable, and doesn’t presume that I should let jews take over the major networks.