Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://nicecrew.digital/objects/14a5dac9-f4cd-4d5b-80a2-74cd481549d7">Doc (d0c40r0@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 19-Jul-2024 11:42:28 JST</a><a href="https://nicecrew.digital/users/d0c40r0" title="d0c40r0@nicecrew.digital"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/5611-48-20220815204238.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Doc" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Doc</a><div><a href="https://poa.st/objects/7701aff3-5990-4a77-880f-673ca0e4215c" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/2604" title="matty@nicecrew.digital">Matty</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/87463" title="will2power@poa.st">Will2Power</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/87938" title="doctorsex@nicecrew.digital">Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq.</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/132780" title="abner@shitpost.cloud">Abner</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/203264" title="transgrammaractivist@mugicha.club">transgrammaractivist</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/247194" title="kingofwhiteamerica@poa.st">☦️KingOfWhiteAmerica☦️</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/248218" title="snidely_whiplash@nicecrew.digital">Snidely_Whiplash</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/249345" title="peterpower@poa.st">PeterPower</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/252178" title="bobbala@nicecrew.digital">Bob</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/254801" title="james_dixon@poa.st">James_Dixon</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/255033" title="sulla_felix@poa.st">Sulla</a></li></ul></div></section><article>idk man I just find a guy arguing a 1769 variant of a 1611 translation based on a 1534 collection of texts over a 325 Christian text funny, especially when the main point of contention is summarization<br><br>Every text in the Bible is a summary in some regard but when Paul does it it's okay and when a Council of 318 Bishops does it it's not</article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3396363#notice-6680943">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-07-19T11:42:28+09:00" title="Friday, 19-Jul-2024 11:42:28 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://nicecrew.digital/objects/14a5dac9-f4cd-4d5b-80a2-74cd481549d7" rel="external" title="Sent from nicecrew.digital via ActivityPub">nicecrew.digital</a></span></span><a href="https://nicecrew.digital/objects/14a5dac9-f4cd-4d5b-80a2-74cd481549d7">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Doc (d0c40r0@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Friday, 19-Jul-2024 11:42:28 JSTDoc
in reply to
idk man I just find a guy arguing a 1769 variant of a 1611 translation based on a 1534 collection of texts over a 325 Christian text funny, especially when the main point of contention is summarization

Every text in the Bible is a summary in some regard but when Paul does it it's okay and when a Council of 318 Bishops does it it's not
In conversationabout a year ago from nicecrew.digitalpermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice