Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/KraftTea/statuses/112564910850858433">Mark Kraft (krafttea@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Jun-2024 01:17:13 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@KraftTea" title="krafttea@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/76394-48-20240714053838.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Mark Kraft" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Mark Kraft</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol/112564652092762457" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/6452" title="shuro@friends.deko.cloud">shuro</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/44595" title="histopol@mastodon.social">HistoPol (#HP) 🥥 🌴</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol">@HistoPol</a> <a href="https://agora.echelon.pl/users/kravietz">@kravietz</a> <a href="https://friends.deko.cloud/profile/shuro">@shuro</a> My point was that wood is very similar to coal, in terms of being very bad for both CO2 and air pollution. The variable of moisture content greatly impacts CO2 produced per unit of energy. Both wood and coal have varying levels of moisture content.<br>See <a href="https://futuremetrics.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/CO2-from-Wood-and-Coal-Combustion.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://futuremetrics.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/CO2-from-Wood-and-Coal-Combustion.pdf</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3197009#notice-6316878">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-06-06T01:17:13+09:00" title="Thursday, 06-Jun-2024 01:17:13 JST">about 6 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@KraftTea/112564910850858433" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@KraftTea/112564910850858433">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2740648">Untitled attachment</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/564/884/179/531/768/original/4147d37cd41b6c2c.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/564/884/179/531/768/original/4147d37cd41b6c2c.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2740649">Untitled attachment</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/564/909/150/691/798/original/c4ccc89002b5cf20.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/564/909/150/691/798/original/c4ccc89002b5cf20.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2740650">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Mark Kraft (krafttea@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Jun-2024 01:17:13 JSTMark Kraft
in reply to
@HistoPol @kravietz @shuro My point was that wood is very similar to coal, in terms of being very bad for both CO2 and air pollution. The variable of moisture content greatly impacts CO2 produced per unit of energy. Both wood and coal have varying levels of moisture content.
See https://futuremetrics.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/CO2-from-Wood-and-Coal-Combustion.pdf
In conversationabout 6 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice