Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://geekdom.social/users/FantasticalEconomics/statuses/111874074151190235">Kyle Montanio (fantasticaleconomics@geekdom.social)'s status on Monday, 05-Feb-2024 03:21:03 JST</a><a href="https://geekdom.social/@FantasticalEconomics" title="fantasticaleconomics@geekdom.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/theme/gnusocialjp/default-avatar-stream.png" width="48" height="48" alt="Kyle Montanio" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Kyle Montanio</a><div><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt/111874054173340604" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/28285" title="phil_stevens@mastodon.nz">Phil Stevens :tinoflag:</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/90000" title="gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green">Gerry McGovern</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/104190" title="jackofalltrades@mas.to">Jack of all trades</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/150334" title="geofcox@climatejustice.social">GeofCox</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/154795" title="504dr@climatejustice.social">504DR</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/202158" title="phiofx@hachyderm.io">phiofx</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/225507" title="mwt@econtwitter.net">Matthew W. Thomas</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt">@mwt</a></p><p>That... may be an even worse interpretation. You know what economists are most known for, right? It's jumping into realms we don't know and making naive models we were trained on and pretending they have meaning in contexts we don't have a clue about. </p><p>Which brings us back to Nordhaus and the climate. Climate scientists are rightfully pissed because of this armchair theory and people listening to it. </p><p> <a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades">@jackofalltrades</a> <a href="https://mastodon.tedomum.net/@lienrag">@lienrag</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/@phiofx">@phiofx</a> <a href="https://mastodon.nz/@phil_stevens">@phil_stevens</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@GeofCox">@GeofCox</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@504DR">@504DR</a> <a href="https://mastodon.green/@gerrymcgovern">@gerrymcgovern</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2648295#notice-5304680">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-02-05T03:21:03+09:00" title="Monday, 05-Feb-2024 03:21:03 JST">about 10 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://geekdom.social/@FantasticalEconomics/111874074151190235" rel="external" title="Sent from geekdom.social via ActivityPub">geekdom.social</a></span></span><a href="https://geekdom.social/@FantasticalEconomics/111874074151190235">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Kyle Montanio (fantasticaleconomics@geekdom.social)'s status on Monday, 05-Feb-2024 03:21:03 JSTKyle Montanio
in reply to
@mwt
That... may be an even worse interpretation. You know what economists are most known for, right? It's jumping into realms we don't know and making naive models we were trained on and pretending they have meaning in contexts we don't have a clue about.
Which brings us back to Nordhaus and the climate. Climate scientists are rightfully pissed because of this armchair theory and people listening to it.
@jackofalltrades @lienrag @phiofx @phil_stevens @GeofCox @504DR @gerrymcgovern
In conversationabout 10 months ago from geekdom.socialpermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice