Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://econtwitter.net/users/mwt/statuses/111860473550282811">Matthew W. Thomas (mwt@econtwitter.net)'s status on Sunday, 04-Feb-2024 20:14:23 JST</a><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt" title="mwt@econtwitter.net"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/225507-48-20240130182502.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Matthew W. Thomas" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Matthew W. Thomas</a><div><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/111858724985266236" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/28285" title="phil_stevens@mastodon.nz">Phil Stevens :tinoflag:</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/90000" title="gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green">Gerry McGovern</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/104190" title="jackofalltrades@mas.to">Jack of all trades</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/136420" title="fantasticaleconomics@geekdom.social">Kyle Montanio</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/150334" title="geofcox@climatejustice.social">GeofCox</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/154795" title="504dr@climatejustice.social">504DR</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/202158" title="phiofx@hachyderm.io">phiofx</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades">@jackofalltrades</a> you can lookup what peer review is. It's a standard process. No one has come up with something better.</p><p>Obviously anything heterodox has been rejected by the mainstream. That's what it means to not be in the mainstream.</p><p>I'm not going to lookup a bunch a random names for you. You can find out for yourself who created the journals of various heterodox schools.</p><p><a href="https://geekdom.social/@FantasticalEconomics">@FantasticalEconomics</a> <a href="https://mastodon.tedomum.net/@lienrag">@lienrag</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/@phiofx">@phiofx</a> <a href="https://mastodon.nz/@phil_stevens">@phil_stevens</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@GeofCox">@GeofCox</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@504DR">@504DR</a> <a href="https://mastodon.green/@gerrymcgovern">@gerrymcgovern</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2648295#notice-5301974">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-02-04T20:14:23+09:00" title="Sunday, 04-Feb-2024 20:14:23 JST">about 10 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt/111860473550282811" rel="external" title="Sent from econtwitter.net via ActivityPub">econtwitter.net</a></span></span><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt/111860473550282811">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Matthew W. Thomas (mwt@econtwitter.net)'s status on Sunday, 04-Feb-2024 20:14:23 JSTMatthew W. Thomas
in reply to
@jackofalltrades you can lookup what peer review is. It's a standard process. No one has come up with something better.
Obviously anything heterodox has been rejected by the mainstream. That's what it means to not be in the mainstream.
I'm not going to lookup a bunch a random names for you. You can find out for yourself who created the journals of various heterodox schools.
@FantasticalEconomics @lienrag @phiofx @phil_stevens @GeofCox @504DR @gerrymcgovern
In conversationabout 10 months ago from econtwitter.netpermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice