Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mas.to/users/jackofalltrades/statuses/111858724985266236">Jack of all trades (jackofalltrades@mas.to)'s status on Sunday, 04-Feb-2024 20:14:23 JST</a><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades" title="jackofalltrades@mas.to"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/104190-48-20230304123253.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Jack of all trades" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Jack of all trades</a><div><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt/111858227784406994" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/28285" title="phil_stevens@mastodon.nz">Phil Stevens</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/90000" title="gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green">Gerry McGovern</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/136420" title="fantasticaleconomics@geekdom.social">Kyle Montanio</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/150334" title="geofcox@climatejustice.social">GeofCox</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/154795" title="504dr@climatejustice.social">504DR</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/202158" title="phiofx@hachyderm.io">phiofx</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/225507" title="mwt@econtwitter.net">Matthew W. Thomas</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt">@mwt</a> <a href="https://geekdom.social/@FantasticalEconomics">@FantasticalEconomics</a> <a href="https://mastodon.tedomum.net/@lienrag">@lienrag</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/@phiofx">@phiofx</a> <a href="https://mastodon.nz/@phil_stevens">@phil_stevens</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@GeofCox">@GeofCox</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@504DR">@504DR</a> <a href="https://mastodon.green/@gerrymcgovern">@gerrymcgovern</a> </p><p>How do you know it's below the bar? Who sets the bar and gets to differentiate between "innovative, important research" and pseudoscience?</p><p>Is Kate Raworth's work "below the bar"? Steven Keen's? David Harvey's? Was Herman Daly's?</p><p>What journals they got rejected from and what new journals they created to legimitize their "nonsense methodologies and junk results"?</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2648295#notice-5301973">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-02-04T20:14:23+09:00" title="Sunday, 04-Feb-2024 20:14:23 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/111858724985266236" rel="external" title="Sent from mas.to via ActivityPub">mas.to</a></span></span><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/111858724985266236">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Jack of all trades (jackofalltrades@mas.to)'s status on Sunday, 04-Feb-2024 20:14:23 JSTJack of all trades
in reply to
@mwt @FantasticalEconomics @lienrag @phiofx @phil_stevens @GeofCox @504DR @gerrymcgovern
How do you know it's below the bar? Who sets the bar and gets to differentiate between "innovative, important research" and pseudoscience?
Is Kate Raworth's work "below the bar"? Steven Keen's? David Harvey's? Was Herman Daly's?
What journals they got rejected from and what new journals they created to legimitize their "nonsense methodologies and junk results"?
In conversationabout 9 months ago from mas.topermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice