Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mas.to/users/jackofalltrades/statuses/111857274992960049">Jack of all trades (jackofalltrades@mas.to)'s status on Sunday, 04-Feb-2024 20:14:26 JST</a><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades" title="jackofalltrades@mas.to"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/104190-48-20230304123253.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Jack of all trades" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Jack of all trades</a><div><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt/111852780251361194" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/28285" title="phil_stevens@mastodon.nz">Phil Stevens</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/90000" title="gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green">Gerry McGovern</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/136420" title="fantasticaleconomics@geekdom.social">Kyle Montanio</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/150334" title="geofcox@climatejustice.social">GeofCox</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/154795" title="504dr@climatejustice.social">504DR</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/202158" title="phiofx@hachyderm.io">phiofx</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/225507" title="mwt@econtwitter.net">Matthew W. Thomas</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt">@mwt</a> <a href="https://geekdom.social/@FantasticalEconomics">@FantasticalEconomics</a> <a href="https://mastodon.tedomum.net/@lienrag">@lienrag</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/@phiofx">@phiofx</a> <a href="https://mastodon.nz/@phil_stevens">@phil_stevens</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@GeofCox">@GeofCox</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@504DR">@504DR</a> <a href="https://mastodon.green/@gerrymcgovern">@gerrymcgovern</a> </p><p>"You don't want groups that only accept certain conclusions."</p><p>Agreed!</p><p>To me the mainstream appears like such a group though. Economics is a social science and due to the subject matter it cannot ever reach the rigor and objectivity of a natural science like physics. That's why I think plurality of voices and points of view is very important.</p><p>1/4</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2648295#notice-5301968">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-02-04T20:14:26+09:00" title="Sunday, 04-Feb-2024 20:14:26 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/111857274992960049" rel="external" title="Sent from mas.to via ActivityPub">mas.to</a></span></span><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/111857274992960049">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Jack of all trades (jackofalltrades@mas.to)'s status on Sunday, 04-Feb-2024 20:14:26 JSTJack of all trades
in reply to
@mwt @FantasticalEconomics @lienrag @phiofx @phil_stevens @GeofCox @504DR @gerrymcgovern
"You don't want groups that only accept certain conclusions."
Agreed!
To me the mainstream appears like such a group though. Economics is a social science and due to the subject matter it cannot ever reach the rigor and objectivity of a natural science like physics. That's why I think plurality of voices and points of view is very important.
1/4
In conversationabout 9 months ago from mas.topermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice