Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://econtwitter.net/users/mwt/statuses/111846840001360031">Matthew W. Thomas (mwt@econtwitter.net)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 07:18:01 JST</a><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt" title="mwt@econtwitter.net"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/225507-48-20240130182502.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Matthew W. Thomas" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Matthew W. Thomas</a><div><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/111845930511507672" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/28285" title="phil_stevens@mastodon.nz">Phil Stevens :tinoflag:</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/90000" title="gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green">Gerry McGovern</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/104190" title="jackofalltrades@mas.to">Jack of all trades</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/136420" title="fantasticaleconomics@geekdom.social">Kyle Montanio</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/150334" title="geofcox@climatejustice.social">GeofCox</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/154795" title="504dr@climatejustice.social">504DR</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/202158" title="phiofx@hachyderm.io">phiofx</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades">@jackofalltrades</a> <a href="https://geekdom.social/@FantasticalEconomics">@FantasticalEconomics</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/@phiofx">@phiofx</a> <a href="https://mastodon.nz/@phil_stevens">@phil_stevens</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@GeofCox">@GeofCox</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@504DR">@504DR</a> <a href="https://mastodon.tedomum.net/@lienrag">@lienrag</a> <a href="https://mastodon.green/@gerrymcgovern">@gerrymcgovern</a> </p><p>I'll give you the largest I can think of for each:</p><p>- public choice<br>- family economics<br>- growth<br>- subsets of environmental, particularly non-hedonic models<br>- equilibrium refinements</p><p>Those are not heterodox ideas. I don't know why you think that they are.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2648295#notice-5273722">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-02-01T07:18:01+09:00" title="Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 07:18:01 JST">about 10 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt/111846840001360031" rel="external" title="Sent from econtwitter.net via ActivityPub">econtwitter.net</a></span></span><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt/111846840001360031">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Matthew W. Thomas (mwt@econtwitter.net)'s status on Thursday, 01-Feb-2024 07:18:01 JSTMatthew W. Thomas
in reply to
@jackofalltrades @FantasticalEconomics @phiofx @phil_stevens @GeofCox @504DR @lienrag @gerrymcgovern
I'll give you the largest I can think of for each:
- public choice
- family economics
- growth
- subsets of environmental, particularly non-hedonic models
- equilibrium refinements
Those are not heterodox ideas. I don't know why you think that they are.
In conversationabout 10 months ago from econtwitter.netpermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice