Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mas.to/users/jackofalltrades/statuses/111845545006313938">Jack of all trades (jackofalltrades@mas.to)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 00:44:22 JST</a><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades" title="jackofalltrades@mas.to"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/104190-48-20230304123253.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Jack of all trades" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Jack of all trades</a><div><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt/111845475597686162" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/28285" title="phil_stevens@mastodon.nz">Phil Stevens :tinoflag:</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/90000" title="gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green">Gerry McGovern</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/136420" title="fantasticaleconomics@geekdom.social">Kyle Montanio</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/150334" title="geofcox@climatejustice.social">GeofCox</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/154795" title="504dr@climatejustice.social">504DR</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/202158" title="phiofx@hachyderm.io">phiofx</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/225507" title="mwt@econtwitter.net">Matthew W. Thomas</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://econtwitter.net/@mwt">@mwt</a></p><p>No, mainstream economics is not ideologically diverse in any shape or form, don't be ridiculous.</p><p>You are trying to argue that mainstream economics is a "real" science, while heterodox schools are "ideological". Just because you are blind to the ideology behind mainstream economics doesn't mean it's not there. And there is plenty, in many of its assumptions and methodologies.</p><p><a href="https://geekdom.social/@FantasticalEconomics">@FantasticalEconomics</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/@phiofx">@phiofx</a> <a href="https://mastodon.nz/@phil_stevens">@phil_stevens</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@GeofCox">@GeofCox</a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/@504DR">@504DR</a> <a href="https://mastodon.tedomum.net/@lienrag">@lienrag</a> <a href="https://mastodon.green/@gerrymcgovern">@gerrymcgovern</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2648295#notice-5262413">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-01-31T00:44:22+09:00" title="Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 00:44:22 JST">about 10 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/111845545006313938" rel="external" title="Sent from mas.to via ActivityPub">mas.to</a></span></span><a href="https://mas.to/@jackofalltrades/111845545006313938">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Jack of all trades (jackofalltrades@mas.to)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jan-2024 00:44:22 JSTJack of all trades
in reply to
@mwt
No, mainstream economics is not ideologically diverse in any shape or form, don't be ridiculous.
You are trying to argue that mainstream economics is a "real" science, while heterodox schools are "ideological". Just because you are blind to the ideology behind mainstream economics doesn't mean it's not there. And there is plenty, in many of its assumptions and methodologies.
@FantasticalEconomics @phiofx @phil_stevens @GeofCox @504DR @lienrag @gerrymcgovern
In conversationabout 10 months ago from mas.topermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice