@amerika @PurpCat @Humpleupagus @Zerglingman @anonymous @ins0mniak @p @amanda @lanodan @mint I think it has more to do with an ideological bias. Believing just because it is completely generated by a human it has "soul" regardless of the objective traits it the art, if it is trash or if the "artist" really cultivated the necessary skill to produce something aesthetically pleasing. Instead, we have the "inclusion" mob claiming that highly skilled illustrators are the same that talent-less gallery art hacks meanwhile AI can generate a 10 times more aesthetically pleasing image than those "gallery artists".