@amerika @AnimeTradCath @BowsacNoodle @CatLord @DiamondMind @Inginsub @LordMordred @NecroKvntPuke @SoyMagnus @Terry @Waerloga @anonymous @dcc @ehhh @gh0st @ins0mniak @jasonl8446 @kumicota @lunarised @marine @mia @mischievoustomato @peemasons @pressure @pwm @redneonglow @sjw @thebitchisback @threat @tiskaan @triodug @warmbeverageenjoyer

> Moving the goalposts: leaving everyone else alone is a form of pacifism. This allows people doing crazy bad stuff to keep doing it.

People doing crazy bad stuff in a way that doesn't affect anyone else? That's fine. People doing crazy bad stuff that involves them refusing to leave other people alone is negating the premise.

> Do we leave Ted Bundy alone? There is a good argument for it, since he preys on the credulous, but you lose the ability to exist without constant vigilance.

If I say "The problem is people won't leave other people to their business" and you say "Well, Ted Bundy didn't leave people to their business" that's not really a refutation, it's making my case.
238.png