@amerika @AnimeTradCath @BowsacNoodle @CatLord @DiamondMind @Inginsub @LordMordred @NecroKvntPuke @SoyMagnus @Terry @Waerloga @anonymous @dcc @ehhh @gh0st @ins0mniak @jasonl8446 @kumicota @lunarised @marine @mia @mischievoustomato @peemasons @pressure @pwm @redneonglow @sjw @thebitchisback @threat @tiskaan @triodug @warmbeverageenjoyer

> I disagree. In permanent civilization, people thrive based on socializing instead of pure production.

You're worried about whether individual drones in the anthill are pulling their weight. One of your neurons is doing something stupid and another neuron is looking at it and declaring that "Permanent skull means Darwin is dead, we used to just be single-celled organisms and we ate plankton and now we are weak and can't even survive outside the skull". You don't understand ants by looking at drones, you don't understand humanity by looking at individuals.

The ultimate test of natural selection is whether or not it gets you killed. The Neanderthals didn't grow wheat and we bashed their heads in with rocks and ate them and used the calories and protein that we got from their corpses to invent bronze hatchets and bows and arrows which we then used to kill more Neanderhtals and once we took over the earth we invented cathode tubes to shoot X-rays through Otzi and onto cellophane so we could have some insight into a random Neanderthal that we filled with arrows and then dug up 70,000 years later.