@smallcircles @jens @bagder @onepict @abucci @bkuhn The only remotely useful (for a software license text) criterium I have seen in this space so far is a requirement that if the use is for-profit, it must be in a workers-owned setting. Which could work for e.g. Fediverse tooling. Less so for a wordprocessor. And still does not meet the open source definition, but that definition is not holy writ either.