GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice

  1. Embed this notice
    pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Friday, 20-Feb-2026 08:10:34 JSTpistoleropistolero
    in reply to
    • anime graf mays ?️?
    • :segasaturn:
    • MK-ULTRA
    • Sharia
    • SilverDeth
    • Her Menstruating Testes 🇮🇳
    • 🌈ᚩ🌈
    • Some call me Prodigal, some call me Waerloga . . .
    • DEMON
    • YaboiSugoi :archlinux: :verified:
    • GhostOfMoshe
    • di0nysius the patomskyite
    • Växẍ Säbbäth
    • New Year Mixes
    • Kensurgence
    • Impeccata
    @Godsend @DiamondMind @GhostOfMoshe @Kensurgence @MagicMoshe @Mombi @SilverDeth @VaxxSabbath @bonifartius @freemayonnaise @graf @mkultra @takao @thebitchisback @w0rm @yaboisugoi

    > Like I said, presentation layer dislike issue.

    If I address a human and he delegates his response to a machine, then that man is a dickhead. I read and consider and reply and that guy sends a machine. There are notifications and they're from humans and a bot is here taking the time.

    And what are you, anyway? You type, you have thoughts? Or should I just ignore what you say and ask a chatbot next time? You bother talking to your kids or do you send a machine to speak for you there, too? You know how to fuck your wife or you sent a robot so many times that you forgot? If that shit sounds insulting then you've still got an intuition that there's a line: some things you send a machine to do and some you don't. Now, I say I'm not interested in reading goddamn copypasta from a robot, and you don't have to think I'm correct but I'm not reading the robot copypasta either way, and I've said this to you and then you complain when I start having a machine write the response.

    There are people that don't like some names you call them, right, and you don't have to agree with their reasoning but you can either listen to them when they say "Do not say that shit to me" or you can do it anyway and deal. I'm saying do not say that shit to me. I didn't say never say it, I didn't say never use the thing, don't give me that again, I'm saying that such messages are understood to be hostile from my end.

    Some people are pleased if you pull your dick out to show to them and some people get real pissed off if you do that. You complain, "Ironic, since you've seen dicks before" or "But you *have* a dick. Do you think dicks are bad?" or "So you hate my dick, huh? Why did you come down so hard on it? It's just my dick."

    If I say to Will Smith that I'm going to fuck his wife, he will be sad; some people consider that an acceptable thing to do, Will Smith does not.

    Some people probably don't mind if you type shit at a robot and then paste it at them: tell them, because I do not want to see that shit. I don't know how to make it any clearer. I think I'm within my rights to tell you not to pull out your dick in front of me.

    > Ironic, given you're a back-end developer

    "If you ever build a thing, then you're not allowed to think that a tool that is a subtype of a thing has appropriate contexts and inappropriate contexts."
    In conversationabout 10 days ago from fsebugoutzone.orgpermalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.