@EvilSandmich @BroDrillard @sickburnbro @jb my money's on Trump never playing for all the cookies and then a 2028 win by some Bill Clinton type (it's the economy, stupid; I feel your pain; obviously corrupt slippery perverted cuck) and the left winning soundly enough to feel comfortable turning the violence down like the dial was always firmly in hand. The rabble will feel betrayed but will also get away with current levels of vioelnce. Some screws will tighten on the right but none of the victimization will resonate among the right for the usual reasons: that guy was just too stupid, just too rash, technically he committed a crime, he really did something bad that he himself regrets so a 400-year prison sentence is completely fine, etc.

The left has the hysterical shrieking at 11/10 but you shouldn't read too much into that. The left *enjoys* hysterical shrieking. Civil unrest is red meat tossed to grateful college students who finally get to emulate Rosa Parks by bludgeoning an old lady.

It's also well known that the flee when no men pursueth, so more sincere panicky behavior like fleeing the country and not just threatening to, that doesn't really imply that there's any threat to flee from.

I realize this all sounds very blackpilling but all I'm trying to do is respect the previous rounds of violence and instability that the US has lived through. The current era doesn't have a Weather Underground, it doesn't have the Oklahoma City bombing, it doesn't have Ruby or Waco Ridge, it doesn't have the War of Northern Aggression. If you read Rothbard's "Conceived in Liberty" there was some insane political knife-fighting going down in the colonial era as well.

I also think that the retarded economic warfare is going to damage the country so much that a lot of the hot button issues will seem quaint in comparison.