@LukeAlmighty@dave@alyx this is the same kind of logic antifa uses to justify attacking you, so actually he's acting in self defense too, making it illegal and unjustifiable for you to kill him
You said, the jews were right to commit a genocide. From there on, the danger was established.
Your examples are based on "one side attacking first", but that's retarded. Both sides know, that the other one can attack at any moment. Do you understand that concept? A Stand off?
Self-defense works when your life is in IMMEDIATE threat
Under most circumstances, yes. But most people are never going to run into a situation where they find out someone is planning to kill them in advance. Approximately a third of all living jews were exterminated in the holocaust, and the only reason it wasn’t all of them is because Hitler had bitten off more than he could chew and was defeated militarily. Jews organizing and killing the people actively trying to exterminate them would have absolutely been justified.
@dave@LukeAlmighty Destiny clearly states: "at the very least, people who were a part of the SS, or nazi politicians". Problem is, if you were a jewish person, it wouldn't be a nazi politician that would have their gun pointed at you. It might not even be a proper SS member. It's gonna be a low level grunt, that acts on the orders of his higher-ups. So the way I see it, this being an argument of killing out of self-defense makes no sense.
Self-defense works when your life is in IMMEDIATE threat, not when "well, I'm convinced those people are gonna eventually come to kill me because of their ideology". That's not self-defense, that's acting in anticipation of a threat. It's Minority Report, without an actual clairvoyant.
What Destiny seems to argue, is that if we're convinced the Nazis are an existential threat, we are in the right to kill them.
Forgive me for not going too much farther into the stream. Maybe there are better arguments made later on in the discussion, but frankly both of them simply annoy me when they speak.
@dave Oh, Hi Dave. There are several ways of looking at it. 1) The old fassion war stance. Meaning, that every war is amoral. That obviously ain't his point.
Or, we can take the defense point. Well, he didn't talk about defense there, did he? He said genocide. That means mass murdering, and if jews are genociding you under the flag of defense, that means you can defend against their "defense" justyfying the supposed original aggression.
@LukeAlmighty I think you’re misinterpreting what he’s saying. Jews were actively being exterminated in Germany, and killing the people trying to kill you is self-defense. Notice that he says it was OK for jews to kill nazis, not Germans.
@LukeAlmighty@Senator_Armstrong@alyx I do not need to “prove” anything. You are simping for a schizo faggot that would murder a lot of innocent people if he believed he would get away with it.
@dave@Senator_Armstrong@LukeAlmighty@alyx Unlike you, I follow NEET, and I've seen him antagonize a lot of actual Nazis over their racial beliefs, he's not a would-be mass murderer, he seems like a regular White guy who if anything leaned libertarian, but who learned the hard way that other people (specifically leftists and nonwhites) generally didn't share his live and let live mindset, and insist on making White people pay for supposed past injustices.
@LukeAlmighty@Senator_Armstrong@alyx Not responding to this. He is staying blocked, and I will absolutely block you too if you keep helping him block evade.
@dave@Senator_Armstrong Speak of the devil. In this thread you justify the use of genocide to counteract your own genocide. You only limit this to cases where your people are actively being killed. Well, as it turns out, I can name us place like that in real life today: South Africa.
White South Africans are targeted for racial violence routinely, making them actively killed. The government routinely threatens to "expropriate" their land "without compensation," and the people doing it sing "Kill The Boxer" as these demands hash out. When you combine these things, all racially motivated, you have an active extermination of Whites going on.
Which raises the following question: should South African Whites put down this active extermination with extreme prejudice? Your options are:
1) Yes, they absolutely should, because I, Dave, am internally consistent 2) No, in my system of thought, Whites uniquely lack the right to self defense on a racial scale (default if you do not answer)
Going to have to ask @LukeAlmighty and @alyx to forward the question to Dave since he blocked me.
@Senator_Armstrong@LukeAlmighty “Actual history makes my ideology look bad, so since I’m a weak-minded faggot I’m just going to stick my head in the sand and pretend it didn’t happen”
@dave@LukeAlmighty You don't even know what my ideology is. What did you think just because I can debunk zionist propaganda that I worship Hitler? You're a woke regime shill and that is disgusting. Innocent whites die because of assholes like you and there will be consequences you cannot escape, I'll make sure of it.
@divVerent@loveFromBirkenau@PonyPanda@LukeAlmighty@alyx@dave@Alex "The NSDAP had a vested interest to claim most of the killed were Jews to justify their actions consistently with their ideology. Like, I knew people who had been threatened to end up in a camp if they "keep spreading Jewish thought", even though they were not Jewish at all, just complaining about the government." A: how old are you nigger? that shit happened 80 years ago B: The NSDAP did not claim that anyone was killed, jews and their kangaroo courts did. They backed up these claims with ridiculous stories from jews and the testimony of Germans who had been held and tortured.
You have exposed your ignorance of the claims of the so called "holocaust". No one can really be blamed for being ignorant because the official story keeps changing and varies depending on which source you talk to. But please don't try backing up your ignorance of what they claim about the holocaust with your own inventions and psuedo-intellectualism.
@loveFromBirkenau@PonyPanda@LukeAlmighty@alyx@dave@Bill_Boone@Alex I think we all vehemently agree that the 6 million number is a rough estimate, no more than that. Or, for a more current example, just look at the number of killed soldiers as claimed by Ukraine and as claimed by Russia. There is probably not even malice there, both sides estimate using their own methods and are off from each other by a factor from 5 to 10 in the direction they like to be off in.
Even if we assume the 6 million number is at the center (i.e. "unbiased"), that still allows the real amount to be in the range from 2 to 20 billions. If we assume it is "anywhere", anything from 600k to 60M is possible.
Another "counting error" could be in who you consider a Jew and who not. The NSDAP had a vested interest to claim most of the killed were Jews to justify their actions consistently with their ideology. Like, I knew people who had been threatened to end up in a camp if they "keep spreading Jewish thought", even though they were not Jewish at all, just complaining about the government. Maybe some of those were counted in this number too.
None of this means it didn't happen though. But getting accurate numbers is painfully hard to impossible.
@divVerent@PonyPanda@LukeAlmighty@alyx@dave@Bill_Boone@Alex > In May 2002, Fritjof Meyer, former chief editor of the Hamburg news magazine "Der Spiegel," published a rather startling article with the title "Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz. Neue Erkenntnisse durch neue Archivfunde" (The Number of Auschwitz Victims: New Revelations Through New Archival Discoveries).[11] Meyer defends the thesis of homicidal gassings but deviates from his predecessors in two important points:
> In the first place, he moves the center of the alleged mass murders from the crematories to the so-called 'Bunkers' of Birkenau. In the second place, he lowers the number of Auschwitz victims to 510,000. This contrasts greatly with 1,100,000 (the number presently postulated by official historiography)[12] and 711,000 to 631,000 (the numbers postulated by Pressac.)[13].
> Meyer maintains that "The actual genocide probably took place in the two converted farmhouses outside the camp" (page 632). Since in his view 510,000 persons were killed in the camp, of whom 356,000 were gassed, it is clear that he thinks the alleged mass murders took place almost entirely in the Birkenau "Bunkers."
I think Auschwitz started off at 4 million and the "affirm at all costs" crowd, I mean historians *cough* seem to be barely holding on to 356,000. The official narrative will have to undergo re-construction from time to time to keep the game going, one sympathizes. We'll just have to ignore the untold repetitions of the 40 year lie of 4 million, 6million, 10 bajillion, lamp shades etc =)
@dave@LukeAlmighty@alyx@s8n@Alex Most of the general population have confused war propaganda and decades of media manipulation for historical fact around WW2, america built an entire "we are the good guys" (goys) image around it.
Holocaust affirming is an easy and lazy path to take, and you will have system backing and social backing to do so, none of that means the claims surrounding that war were in any way what happened.
You should do the research yourself if you are ever curious what events, claims, and numbers are entirely in dispute to this day and logistically could never have occurred despite the media-instilled wide spread consensus around this specific hoax of a "genocide".
The general population believes lots of retarded stuff the holohoax is not even among the worst of it. No one wants to address it because they would have to re-evaluate who they are, who their country is, and whether they are really the good guys they think they are, that they may not be able to reconcile what they wrote in and reinforced in the history that they were.