Thanks, everyone. So, Fedidb.com shows that about 1 out of every 4 users on the Fediverse is on mastodon.social. I think if mastodon.social rolled up over 3 months, per the server covenant, then maybe 10% of them would move to other servers. Most accounts would just disappear.
@evan MAU or total? There's so many inactive & garbage accounts on there, if 10% are active meatbags who move elsewhere, I think that would be a great success.
I think there would be a period of activity as those of us who are left try to figure out what to do next, and a bunch of other servers throw in the towel too. Then, with considerably less activity, a slow decline. A few holdout servers, a long tail of family or personal servers, and then quiet. A lot of bots still running. Without content, people wouldn't load their timelines, and without people being active, no new content. Vicious cycle.
@evan Are the details of that $100k/year posted somewhere? I don't doubt this, but I'm so curious about how this happens. Must be must bigger than I can fathom? (Is there a "market" for a much more efficient Mastodon?) So many questions. (-:
@evan Slightly off topic, but contrasting this to other social medias I use (whatsapp groups, LinkedIn) most of the mutuals here I only know from here. For the others, theres usually a real life connection. I don’t know how common this is.
@evan if the protocol supported true account migration (all posts with all attachments, all likes, boosts etc.) we might see more people standing up their own single or multi user instance. I'd do it, but I don't want to loose all my previous posts and data.
@evan Yeah if we define Fediverse as ”general purpose social network” like the big four, then yes, it would disappear, but it’s questionable if we’re tall enough to be on that ride to begin with.
If Fediverse is ”connected network of communities” then no. The communities would lose some members but keep going, that’s the current ongoing trend anyway. But I think there will always be Fediverse communities on the internet
@mojala it would be great to have global user search, opt-in using the discoverable flag, so you could find your friends, family, neighbors and colleagues.
@evan Facebook, Insta, Threads and Twitter. I do realise there are lot more but those seem to be the pre-accepted answers to ”what are your socials?” question around my neck of the woods.
@evan Thanks Evan for exploring this and thinking about it. I wasn't aware that the fediverse at present has this very distinctive shape - actually somewhat similar to the ATmosphere with its one huge instance and a couple of smaller ones. I don't have any thoughts cos I'm a novice here but I appreciate knowing more.
One thing that people who don't write #ActivityPub software might not know is that Mastodon has remarkably low rate limits for other servers to make requests -- getting data from or sending data to a Mastodon server. The rate limits are hard-coded in the Mastodon software, and they're for the whole server. mastodon.social has the same rate limits as your server on a Raspberry Pi. That means that the server that you need to access about 1/4 of the time is throttling everyone's access to it.
@burnie configurable rate limits in Mastodon, or having 20 or 50 newbie servers (maybe per-country subdomains like fr.mastodon.social, mx.mastodon.social, au.mastodon.social).
@evan What to do with this information? Would a 'newby' or start server with some help and a time limit (3 months?) work? By then users can find a community and move to it? Maybe an idea for a poll ...
@gregprice I think it would not just be from having fewer accounts on the network posting, although I think we are dipping pretty low for a sustainable network already.
mastodon.social is also a hub in the network; users there redistribute content from other parts of the network with their boosts and replies.
It's also the flagship server. It would be a hit to morale to have it taken offline.
@evan Why do you think that losing 1/4 of users would make people no longer want to be here? The network had 1/4 fewer users in the past, and it was already lively then.
@darth no problem. I think rate limits are important for any Web servers. In the Mastodon software, they are hard-coded, so a big server like mastodon.social with 3M users has the same limits as a personal server on a RazPi with 1 user.
@evan I still don’t see the problem. It’s not like I ever had a functional problem with my Mastodon server so if it is conserving cpu cycles the way you described it then all seems good, no?
EDIT: sorry, now I read your bio and I see where you are comming from. Ignore my reply.