Nothing in there conflicts with anything I said. If you have something to say, say it instead of asking me to refute my own point.
> Im anti leave my fucking money out of it.
I can sympathize with this point but you are not talking about your money, you're talking about the poor children.
> I do not want to fund Israel's retarded defense.
I can get on-board with "Let's stop fucking with the Middle East" but given that we are, some types of fucking make sense and some do not.
> I want nothing to do in the middle east.
Oil's gotta come from somewhere until we step up nuclear or start pushing fusion; reactor in the EU just got its first energy-positive run, that was cool. But anyway, we will still need oil to keep from setting *everything* on fire in the interim.
You know, you build a Jenga tower and then you put all of your society on top of it and you can't just yank pieces at the bottom and say "tough shit". I hate the horrific shit the post-Bernays world does but you can't just turn it off overnight and even if you could, we're all gonna die very soon after that occurs.
> Really spinning it as there are better topics to mention.
If my point is the emotional investment and moralizing around geopolitics, Russia/Ukraine is one of the best examples outside Israel/Palestine.
> lol, you think you're gonna get fusion when the CIA specifically kills those scientists.
I said we'd need that to stop caring about oil. I didn't say it's possible. I pointed out the recent success they had with an experiment in the EU and said that even if we did suddenly have fusion reactors tomorrow, oil would still matter for decades. You have to get better at reading, pernis.