Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Oct-2025 22:47:20 JST Bread up, Bro
   this is gonna be hilarious as 100,000 indians try to jam into US colleges
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Oct-2025 22:47:20 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to
     would you call this not a loop hole but a dot hole?
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 00:57:05 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard that's quite possible, but at this point, if he *does* care about himself, there don't seem to be many ways to ensure that.
   • Embed this notice
     Joel W (thetruthaddict@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 00:57:06 JST Joel W

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard

     @BroDrillard @sickburnbro how do you not understand Trump doesnt give a fuck about anything or anyone other than himself? You know, like literally every other politician

   • Embed this notice
     BroDrillard (brodrillard@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 00:57:07 JST BroDrillard

     in reply to
     How the hell does the Trump admin not understand that people want to less immigration including "legal". Esp fucking jeets.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 00:58:57 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • leespringfield1903
     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @leespringfield1903 @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard the whole globalist project has been cooking since WW1, "no more nations means no more wars ( so we can't be blamed for our bloodlust )" has been the whole *thing* - so massive population destroying immigration is just not even something to question
   • Embed this notice
     leespringfield1903 (leespringfield1903@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 00:58:58 JST leespringfield1903

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard @sickburnbro The idea of less immigration just makes almost every mainstream politician in the western world just tense up hard.
   • Embed this notice
     Joel W (thetruthaddict@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:08:02 JST Joel W

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard

     @sickburnbro @BroDrillard yup. Its all theater.

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:08:02 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard hmm, so what did Kirk just draw the short straw and said "I did it all for zog, thank you, good night"
   • Embed this notice
     Joel W (thetruthaddict@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:08:03 JST Joel W

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard

     @sickburnbro @BroDrillard i have no clue what you mean.

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:08:03 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard Given what has happened to this point, do you think the progressives will just .. leave him alone after his term?
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:12:12 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard it's not about Trump being a piece of trash or not, it's about "is this a giant piece of theater, or are at least some of these things real"
   • Embed this notice
     Joel W (thetruthaddict@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:12:13 JST Joel W

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard

     @sickburnbro @BroDrillard the fuck he have to do with Trump being a piece of trash?

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:18:01 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard We can disagree about that - the point I'm making is that while it is possible for it to be "all theater" that's also an easy way to wash your hands of the situation, which you're allowed to do; but if you want to be honest with yourself, it's best to test statements like that.
   • Embed this notice
     Joel W (thetruthaddict@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:18:02 JST Joel W

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard

     @sickburnbro @BroDrillard Kirk is irrelevant to this. I said nothing of Kirk, nor implied anything about him.

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:23:21 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     • :allyourbase::papyrus_u_s::papyrus_l_t::papyrus_l_o::papyrus_l_n::papyrus_l_e::papyrus_l_r::papyrus_7::papyrus_1::papyrus_3::windmilloffriendship:
     @stoner713 @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard This isn't about what I think - we're talking about what *he* would choose to do, assuming he cares about his own life.
   • Embed this notice
     :allyourbase::papyrus_u_s::papyrus_l_t::papyrus_l_o::papyrus_l_n::papyrus_l_e::papyrus_l_r::papyrus_7::papyrus_1::papyrus_3::windmilloffriendship: (stoner713@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:23:22 JST :allyourbase::papyrus_u_s::papyrus_l_t::papyrus_l_o::papyrus_l_n::papyrus_l_e::papyrus_l_r::papyrus_7::papyrus_1::papyrus_3::windmilloffriendship:

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @sickburnbro @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard Wait, do you care what happens? He is an enemy to Whites, no matter what window dressing you put in it.
   • Embed this notice
     Joel W (thetruthaddict@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:29:32 JST Joel W

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard

     @sickburnbro @BroDrillard the 'attacks' on Trump are show. That is all I said, all I implied. You wanna put words in my mouth, thats on you

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:29:32 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard like so, if loetta james goes to jail for her lying, was she advised she was going to take a fall for that, or is she a stooge
   • Embed this notice
     leespringfield1903 (leespringfield1903@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:33:01 JST leespringfield1903

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @sickburnbro @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard The whole globalist project leaves an exemption for the greater Israeli project coincidently.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:33:01 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • leespringfield1903
     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @leespringfield1903 @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard and it doesn't really give a shit about all the wars in africa either - it was always about the european elite not wanting to accept their responsibility for the horror of WW1.
     
     The jews also pressed their advantage to the max, post WW2 when the allies were looking to both punish germany and find an easy excuse not to answer for things like dresden.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:33:45 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • egirlyuumimain
     • Joel W
     @egirlyuumimain @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard yeah the dumb black DA from NY, latteila james, whatevah.
   • Embed this notice
     egirlyuumimain (egirlyuumimain@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:33:46 JST egirlyuumimain

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @sickburnbro @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard Stooge, but that's just what she is
   • Embed this notice
     egirlyuumimain (egirlyuumimain@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:33:46 JST egirlyuumimain

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • egirlyuumimain
     • Joel W
     @sickburnbro @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard Im also assuming you mean latetia James, her name is impossible to spell
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:50:43 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard but why even bother? I doubt 2% of MAGA people even know who she is or care? If it's all theater, you should try to try and keep your production as minimal as possible to keep from serious mistakes from happening.
   • Embed this notice
     Joel W (thetruthaddict@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 01:50:44 JST Joel W

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard

     @sickburnbro @BroDrillard my guess would be stooge / patsy. But I also doubt she will do any time

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 02:04:43 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard That's begging the question though; there isn't a binary of "threat" and "non threat" it's a gradient that's hard to measure with a bunch of "de-threatifiying" options that are like weird spells from a puzzle video game.
     
     As to "forgot to cheat" - I always look at Nixon as an example - total electoral domination - so they pressured him out using shit he didn't even do.
   • Embed this notice
     Joel W (thetruthaddict@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 02:04:44 JST Joel W

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard

     @sickburnbro @BroDrillard let's look at this another way. If Trump was really a threat, he wouldnt be in office. Either time. You really think they forgot to cheat in only those 2 elections? And Butler would have been a real hit, with a pro. Not a poorly produced Keystone Cops episode featuring a retard in the starring role.

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 02:08:49 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard Let's play this out- regarding Butler. The system says "shit Trump is too much of a threat, send the pro to take him out" - Pro takes him and and escapes.
     
     What happens next? Because to me, the system would have to be in a massive imminent threat to take the trade of actually being rid of him versus what situational change occurred. An example is before and after Kirk. A lot of people who were saying "this is ok, actually" decided maybe it wasn't.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 02:21:48 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard serves who? And how do we know he's serving them "well"?
   • Embed this notice
     Joel W (thetruthaddict@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 02:21:49 JST Joel W

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard

     @sickburnbro @BroDrillard why would they kill him when he serves them well? There is no 'what next'. He wasnt even shot. That whole thing is fake as fuck. 100% of it.

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 02:51:56 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     • James_Dixon
     @James_Dixon @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard I think what happened in 2020 is pretty obvious; they were all on board the Biden train until he had that disastrous debate and then the decision to pull him was locked in before they had time to really game it out. They played their normal game with pushing their desired candidate through the convention and then absolutely carpeted the country with money bombs to get Kamallama rolling.
     
     The problem is that their control of hollywood has become worthless, but it still is expensive. Their lawfare against trump was moderately effective as it gave the nevertrump sorts plenty of ground to do the "she's a prosecutor, he's a criminal" - but all that juicing just wasn't able to overcome the fact that she's just extremely unlikable.
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 02:51:58 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @thetruthaddict @sickburnbro @BroDrillard > If Trump was really a threat, he wouldnt be in office. Either time.
     
     Trump's win in 2016 was a complete shock to those in power. They thought they had the election locked down.
     
     > You really think they forgot to cheat in only those 2 elections?
     
     See above. In 2016 they thought their normal level of cheating would be enough to assure the election went to Hillary. They panicked when it wasn't.
     
     So in 2020 they went all in on cheating, and it still wasn't enough to beat Trump, so they simply shut the system down and fabricated enough ballots to give the election to Biden.
     
     Biden was so incompetent that a portion of them panicked again and decided that even Trump (as long as he was carefully kept under control) would be a better option. So they tamped down the cheating to only moderate levels and let Trump win. Butler was his warning to stay under control, or else.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 02:57:10 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     • James_Dixon
     @James_Dixon @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard if they had not stuck with Biden in say, january, and done an actual test and settled on say Newsom, they could have probably pushed him over the edge with the normal tricks.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 03:02:07 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     • James_Dixon
     @James_Dixon @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard Well, that's the thing, I don't think cheating is really something where you can easily turn a dial to adjust - you need stuff like what happened in Atlanta with the turning lights off and water main break or whatever - and once you have to start doing that ( and more ) in state after state, it becomes extremely hard to paper over
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 03:02:08 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @sickburnbro @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard > but all that juicing just wasn't able to overcome the fact that she's just extremely unlikable.
     
     They still could have stolen enough states to take the election if they had wanted to. But it would have required even more fake ballots than they used in 2020, and apparently the deep state had simply had enough of Biden/Harris and decided not to.
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 03:11:03 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @sickburnbro @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard > And once you have to start doing that ( and more ) in state after state, it becomes extremely hard to paper over
     
     I don't think the deep state cares anymore. If that's what they need to do, they'll do it.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 03:11:03 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     • James_Dixon
     @James_Dixon @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard That's the problem, there isn't a "President of the Deep State" or even "Dark Council of the Deep State" - but it's a bunch of loosely organized groups, some senior, some junior and coordination is tricky for new things or things that need to be done quickly, but aren't commonly done.
     
     They never are going to write down, at least at a high level something like "We need you to find at least 1,500,000 more ballots that say Kamala on them" - they're going to be a lot of euphemism and ambiguity, which means that to get the required amount of cheating on a quick notice, you would need to slam that shit all the way to 11 - which is probably what leads some blacks in Atlanta to do transparently obvious cheating.
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 03:24:32 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @sickburnbro @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard > That's the problem, there isn't a "President of the Deep State" or even "Dark Council of the Deep State" - but it's a bunch of loosely organized groups, some senior, some junior and coordination is tricky for new things or things that need to be done quickly, but aren't commonly done.
     
     Agreed. 2020 was a panic reaction on their part that forced agreement.
     
     > they're going to be a lot of euphemism and ambiguity, which means that to get the required amount of cheating on a quick notice, you would need to slam that shit all the way to 11
     
     They really don't like to do that as it draws too much attention and they prefer to operate from the shadows. But apparently before he showed he was a coward by walking away they thought Trump was enough of a threat to do so.
     
     Any real pro-White candidate will be treated the same way. They will dial it all the way to 11 if needed.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 03:24:32 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     • James_Dixon
     @James_Dixon @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard the crucial thing about Trump is that he isn't anti-white, which is, sadly, saying something today.
     
     He seems to style himself as the world's greatest negotiator, and it seems like what he wants to do is make some kind of negotiation here.
     
     The problem is that a lot of white people don't feel like they have a balls out representative, and there is little happening that is making that opinion less common.
     
     That's why things like Walsh getting pissed about the Muslim 5am drone noise is worth paying attention to.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 03:50:46 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     • James_Dixon
     @James_Dixon @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard what the left sees is someone that is *willing* to be pro-white though, and so what differs for them is what to do about it.
   • Embed this notice
     James_Dixon (james_dixon@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 23-Oct-2025 03:50:47 JST James_Dixon

     in reply to

     • BroDrillard
     • Joel W
     @sickburnbro @thetruthaddict @BroDrillard > the crucial thing about Trump is that he isn't anti-white, which is, sadly, saying something today.
     
     Correct. He's a traditional civ-nat boomer, with everything that implies.