Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:14 JST Judge Dread
   Democrats might run against AI research in 2028.
   
   In which case they will face the united opposition of Musk and Zuck and billions of bot accounts.
   • Embed this notice
     Weed B Gone (dc5fan@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:08 JST Weed B Gone

     in reply to
     @judgedread So basically no white collar jobs. What about blue collar and manufacturing?
   • Embed this notice
     cjd (cjd@pkteerium.xyz)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:08 JST cjd

     in reply to

     • Weed B Gone
     The main jobs that are going be affected by AI will be Adult Daycare jobs, because they were never meaningful to begin with.
     
     Current era AI is not able to effectively do ANY Real Work, it just prepares reports from summaries and summaries from reports, make slide decks and drafts Polite Professional Emails.
     
     The Adult Daycare jobs exist for political reasons and they will be eliminated for political reasons, so the "AI explosion" is mostly going to be a change of political regime.
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:09 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • Weed B Gone
     @DC5FAN The timeline is:
     
     First replaced: Repetitive tasks with no political salience done entirely on computer.
     
     Second replaced: All non-coding tasks with no political salience done entirely on computer.
     
     Third replaced: The remaining humans whose work is done entirely on the computer, with a tiny number of exceptions who must be diplomatic.
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:10 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • brokenshakles
     @brokenshakles The CEO of the future has no human employees, aside from his sugar baby.
   • Embed this notice
     Weed B Gone (dc5fan@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:10 JST Weed B Gone

     in reply to

     • brokenshakles
     @judgedread @brokenshakles It seems like the C suite folks would be the easiest to replace because basically they just analyze data/information and make decisions. AI can pretty much already do that.
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:11 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • brokenshakles
     @brokenshakles I'm talking about vibe coding pajeet script kiddies having AIs do all their work, not about pajeets working for the AI companies, though that too occurs.
   • Embed this notice
     brokenshakles (brokenshakles@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:11 JST brokenshakles

     in reply to
     @judgedread The point applies either way, why hire a stupid jeet to run an A.I., when a much smarter A.I. agent can do the jeet's job for less money?
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:12 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • NoDoxGregBrady
     @NoDoxGregBrady That was me. That's a foregone conclusion.
     
     Pajeets are making too much money using AI to do their jobs for them to oppose AI.
   • Embed this notice
     brokenshakles (brokenshakles@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:12 JST brokenshakles

     in reply to

     • NoDoxGregBrady
     @judgedread @NoDoxGregBrady In the short term, but consolidation means that eventually there will be only a few jeet companies to rule them all, and people in the West will figure out there is no need to farm out that work to them when they can just run that compute in-house.
   • Embed this notice
     NoDoxGregBrady (nodoxgregbrady@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:21:13 JST NoDoxGregBrady

     in reply to
     @judgedread I'd read an inferral (probably yours) that AI will replace callcenters. The Pajeet Menace should take that as a full frontal assault.
   • Embed this notice
     ins0mniak (ins0mniak@mikoshidata.cloud)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:27:00 JST ins0mniak

     in reply to

     • Weed B Gone
     @DC5FAN @judgedread shit man, those leaves not gonna blow themselves.
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Weed B Gone (dc5fan@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:27:01 JST Weed B Gone

     in reply to
     @judgedread Well at least we won't need Mexicans anymore.
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:27:02 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • Weed B Gone
     @DC5FAN Those vanish when humanoid robots are perfected.
   • Embed this notice
     Weed B Gone (dc5fan@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:27:02 JST Weed B Gone

     in reply to
     @judgedread Similar timeline?
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:27:02 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • Weed B Gone
     @DC5FAN There the limit is the speed of the robot factories.
     
     Workers doing the most dangerous jobs the robots can take over will be replaced first, if only to save on insurance costs.
     
     The rest will depend on when the employer put in their order for humanoid robots. Perhaps it will be first come, first served.
     
     At 10 million robots a year it will take about 16 years to replace all American workers.
   • Embed this notice
     ins0mniak (ins0mniak@mikoshidata.cloud)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:53:56 JST ins0mniak

     in reply to

     • petra
     @judgedread @petra
     
     >Most dudes would be fine with two chicks at the same time.
     
     thats like saying the sun rises in the morning.
     
     well as long as they dont talk.......or need to cuddle
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:53:57 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • petra
     @petra Bostrom's Deep Utopia devotes many walls of words to this subject, showing he's the kind of guy who ends up tenured at Oxford.
     
     Most dudes would be fine with two chicks at the same time.
   • Embed this notice
     petra (petra@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:53:58 JST petra

     in reply to

     • Weed B Gone
     @DC5FAN @judgedread For maybe 80% of the White population it will be good enough. I did volunteering in the past for what they called the disadvantaged at the time. And I got to know a number very well and saw how they lived. You have no idea how fine people are with just existing.
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:53:59 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • Weed B Gone
     @DC5FAN Whatever they want to do.
   • Embed this notice
     Weed B Gone (dc5fan@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:53:59 JST Weed B Gone

     in reply to
     @judgedread Not sure that will be a good thing for society.
   • Embed this notice
     Weed B Gone (dc5fan@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:54:00 JST Weed B Gone

     in reply to
     @judgedread So do our overlords just let us all starve? What's the plan for the cattle?
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:54:00 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • Weed B Gone
     @DC5FAN UBI.
   • Embed this notice
     Weed B Gone (dc5fan@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:54:00 JST Weed B Gone

     in reply to
     @judgedread But what will people do? Lay around watching videos all day?
   • Embed this notice
     Judge Dread (judgedread@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 04:54:01 JST Judge Dread

     in reply to

     • Weed B Gone
     @DC5FAN Which brings up the question of household servants. Industry will be bidding against the rich and upper middle class who want those robots for home use. So it might take an extra decade before the factories can meet the demand sufficient to replace all workers.