Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 08:28:45 JST
Bread up, Bro
the real gentleman likes quartiles -
Embed this notice
Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 08:41:54 JST
Bread up, Bro
@BroDrillard decimating gets misused because you say "the forces were decimated" - which means seriously reduced in fighting capacity, especially in ancient times
median vs average really falls into the same common misuse, where people treat "middle seeking" methods the same, conversationally. -
Embed this notice
BroDrillard (brodrillard@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 08:41:55 JST
BroDrillard
There are a few words even reasonably smart people use incorrectly
decimating - means every 10th, not "majority of them"
exponential - this means a specific growth characteristic (n^x), not just "rather fast", or n^2. That would be quadratic, not exponential.
median - vs average
Likely there are more, I'm just not remembering them right now. -
Embed this notice
Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 09:02:40 JST
Bread up, Bro
@ShovelTrouble they use it in some social science stuff - basically to do what is done here to show that the data is skewed -
Embed this notice
ShovelTrouble (shoveltrouble@pone.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 09:02:41 JST
ShovelTrouble
@sickburnbro I've never seen modal average used outside of a classroom.
-
Embed this notice
Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 09:11:56 JST
Bread up, Bro
@TrevorGoodchild @BroDrillard Joe Rogan has made an entire career of playing dumb -
Embed this notice
Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb: (trevorgoodchild@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 09:11:57 JST
Trevor Goodchild:verified::pondering_orb:
@BroDrillard @sickburnbro Gonzalo Lira was a sexpat spic greaser but one of his best bits was playing dumb and asking leftoids to define "ontologically" if they were stupid enough to try to use it to make a point -
Embed this notice
Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 10:29:38 JST
Bread up, Bro
@Jonny @TrevorGoodchild @BroDrillard people get too up in their ass about it, ontology is essentially just classifying things -
Embed this notice
Jonny (jonny@annihilation.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 10:29:39 JST
Jonny
@TrevorGoodchild @BroDrillard @sickburnbro
I never even heard the word ontology up until a few months ago, from Cliff High on Youtube. He said the opposite of ontology is "grit theory". -
Embed this notice
BroDrillard (brodrillard@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 10:30:36 JST
BroDrillard
Yup, exponential basically means the base is constant and the variable quantity is in the exponent: c^x
When the variable is in the base and the exponent is constant it's called a power function: x^c -
Embed this notice
Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 10:30:36 JST
Bread up, Bro
@BroDrillard @Gideon which is also not logarithmic -
Embed this notice
Gideon (gideon@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 10:30:37 JST
Gideon
I've probably used exponentially rather than quadratic without even realizing it. Just not in my vocab wheelhouse. But I would also think it a compliment if someone called me reasonably smart. -
Embed this notice
Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 10:31:13 JST
Bread up, Bro
@Jonny @BroDrillard @TrevorGoodchild classifying classification is a task that some people do enjoy -
Embed this notice
Jonny (jonny@annihilation.social)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025 10:31:14 JST
Jonny
@sickburnbro @BroDrillard @TrevorGoodchild
Something tells me that the full definition of ontology is yet too be defined.
-
Embed this notice