GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 10:36:39 JST djsumdog djsumdog
    • redwhitebluedude

    So tell my why this doesn't violate the Posse Comitatus Act?

    It's so cute all these conservatives and embracing blanket authoritarianism that they'd all be shitting themselves over if it was Biden.

    In conversation about a year ago from djsumdog.com permalink
    • Embed this notice
      djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 10:44:03 JST djsumdog djsumdog
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • Matt Hamilton
      🤔 ... No, what's that other one .. not Libertarian .. not Commie .. what's the one that wants giant meteor?
      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://djsumdog.com/media/bc/74/7b/bc747bf06b320eb1157ee0a733085b8c3ee0874dba2c659a7823386be30e9f40.png
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 10:44:05 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude

      @djsumdog @redwhitebluedude what are you, a Demonrat?!

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:00:41 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude

      @djsumdog @redwhitebluedude You can tell people it's a uniparty. You can tell them it's all corrupt. You can tell them the two parties exist for each to do things the other can't (without resistance).

      They will agree with you.

      Then the executive will dream up some "emergency" shit to deploy domestic military forces "against leftists" and the "Conservative" seals all clap in unison.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      djsumdog likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:01:11 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • LostInCalifornia

      @LostInCalifornia @djsumdog @redwhitebluedude > promised [to] the states

      My friend, the States lost all say after 1865.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      djsumdog likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      LostInCalifornia (lostincalifornia@spinster.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:01:12 JST LostInCalifornia LostInCalifornia
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • Matt Hamilton

      @eriner @djsumdog @redwhitebluedude If the Guard can be taken over by Washington whenever it wants, then the “militia” that the Second Amendment promised the states — and the people — isn’t really there. That undercuts not just state sovereignty, but the deeper principle that the people themselves should have a defense outside of federal control.

      https://adamkinzinger.substack.com/p/who-really-controls-the-national

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      LostInCalifornia (lostincalifornia@spinster.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:01:51 JST LostInCalifornia LostInCalifornia
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • Matt Hamilton

      @eriner @djsumdog @redwhitebluedude Hardly, hun. If you make that argument it would be 1792 or the Whiskey Rebellion, but the confederacy that ended there was barely creaking along.

      If you think the federal government is the problem, I'm sure you're outraged about the federal government taking stock in private corporations, and installing hall monitors at news stations?

      No? If not, hypocrisy is your brand (and most states's rights argument are just that.)

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:01:51 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • LostInCalifornia

      @LostInCalifornia @djsumdog @redwhitebluedude

      > it would be 1792 or the Whiskey Rebellion

      Sure, but the Civil War (and puppet installment during reconstruction) was the death knell. I mark the beginning of the end at Marbury v Madison (1803), but it was a sure thing by the end of Civil War.

      > I'm sure you're outraged about the federal government taking stock in private corporations

      I'm against nationalization, yes. https://noauthority.social/@eriner/115075825651102373

      > hall monitors at news stations?

      What?

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: static.noauthority.social
        Matt Hamilton (@eriner@noauthority.social)
        from Matt Hamilton
        Attached: 1 image "Stocks are doing great"
      djsumdog likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      LostInCalifornia (lostincalifornia@spinster.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:25:29 JST LostInCalifornia LostInCalifornia
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • Matt Hamilton

      @eriner @djsumdog @redwhitebluedude He installed a political officer at CBS to monitor their news as a condition for the recent merger, and is threatening to do the same at ABC and NBC. (Also, as an aside, we know he watches MSNBC).

      You have an interesting argument with Marbury. Jefferson thought it should be Congress that makes the decisions, but Jefferson was not involved with writing the constitution other than holding it hostage for a bill of rights. Judicial review is not undemocratic. Hamilton is your guy if you want to understand intent.

      The states do have some rights. The Civil War death knell was for the idea that states could ignore human rights the federal government recognized (that's the original purpose of the 14th). Federal law supercedes state law, except where the state law is more liberal. That's a legal concept that has been upheld repeatedly.

      They can maintain a militia at the governor's command, and not the president's for their statewide defense (and wildfire or hurricane response is a defense outside of the federal government's control, especially now that he's gutted federal coordination).

      OTOH, the federal government is expressly forbidden from using the military for law enforcement. EXPRESSLY forbidden.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      djsumdog likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:26:28 JST djsumdog djsumdog
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • LostInCalifornia
      • Matt Hamilton

      "There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights the enemy of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people."

      -2000s Battlestar Galactic

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:38:31 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • LostInCalifornia

      @LostInCalifornia @djsumdog @redwhitebluedude > He installed a political officer at CBS

      Corporate news is indistinguishable from the State.

      > The states do have some rights

      How's that 10th amendment doing?

      > a legal concept that has been upheld repeatedly

      Lol. Like I said, 1803. Marbury v Madison.

      > the federal government is expressly forbidden from using the military for law enforcement

      You don't understand, it's an *emergency*. Kind of like Iraq. Wait, I mean Iran.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
      djsumdog likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:41:33 JST djsumdog djsumdog
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • LostInCalifornia
      • Matt Hamilton
      Recent "emergencies" have included .. Fentanyl? (which allows for international sales tax / a.k.a Tariffs / also love how conservative love federal sales tax now), a Scamdemic of a "virus" that may or may not have been rebranded flu (it literally doesn't even matter if SARS-CoV-2 was real, does it?), whiteness/blackness ... I mean the term "emergency" is used so much it's literally lost all meaning.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:45:35 JST djsumdog djsumdog
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • Matt Hamilton
      • raintrees (ancap in nw-cali)
      There's a Dobb's Town joke in here somewhere
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      raintrees (ancap in nw-cali) (raintrees@noauthority.social)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Aug-2025 12:45:36 JST raintrees (ancap in nw-cali) raintrees (ancap in nw-cali)
      in reply to
      • redwhitebluedude
      • Matt Hamilton

      @djsumdog @eriner @redwhitebluedude Heaven's Gate?

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.